micnificent28

this is the correct answer

No

I love sewell, and would be good with drafting him. The thing is Pitts is a once in 20 years guy, I hear the wr have been kicking the tackle problem done the road argument and that's right. But.. class is deep there. We also haven't really had a Redzone weapon..since I guess Benjamin? PItts has the longest reach ever recorded.. comes down to so you think sewell is a generation tackle and not Jack fisher one of those types.

The huddle is crazy... no to Pitts lol

Just saying

Thats why he is projected to go that high. He isnt the conventional tight end more a weapon/wr te

Pitts is my pick if not a qb... He is a generational talent.

You don't seen to be in high reguwefd around the huddle but in this one instance your absolutely right. We were out of the playoffs.. if your not fighting for a playoff spot you should be looking to build for the future and make it to the superbowl. Winning a meanless game against another bad team doesn't help. See what you have in Walker or Grier play backups plan for the off-season see who u can cut and live without who you want back so on. Shut down your stars take less wear and tear off their bodies.

Look at the image you showed, and the example you gave. There is such a thing as common sense. whatever point you just tried to make didn't apply to me looking up an actual term not a forum called the the huddle. You have to apply common sense to any argument. that is the part that goes over your head and his apparently. You want a Webster's definition for popular slang and it just doesn't work that way. Google search is very viable in doing most anything sure you can do some dumb stuff like you did and come back with poo information but, applying a bit of common sense and does this apply to the point I'm trying to make it works. That's a very bad example....

Just stop it bro. The only one who seems to be silly in this post is you. No one agrees with you, I just don't know how we can make this more clear to you besides just writing you off and saying you know what your right.

This isn't a research paper. I did a quick google search and showed the first thing that came up.There isn't a Websters definition for tanking in sports exactly..what are you trying to prove with this explanation of nothing to do with nothing. I STATED my point and proved what I was trying to say. You one of those guys who come into threads and say grammer* Please take several seats.

You link to an article I did not use in my explanation. I just used the picture. When I looked up the definition of tanking the picture* came up. Another thing who said 2019 to be exact, but the point of does tanking work or not is subjective. I just said they tanked. Which they did and used them as an example. The whole tanking process hanges on who you get and if they work out. You can't just put the whole process under some systematic does tanking work formula. Big difference in landing Andrew luck or Trevor Lawrence vs random year Jake fisher is the number 1 selection.

I went out of my way to look up the definition of tanking for you and literally the dolphins picture popped up.. I can't make this much clearer for for you..

Exactly... those guys weren't scrubs.. they fetched first round value.. top 10 draft picks and young. How is that not tanking?

The fact they tanked away All those assets to build for the future just because they won 5 games there at the end doesnt negate that fact. Trading away young players worth first round value is legit the idea behind a fire sale and tanking... plz learn the gm

This is my point. But you see the huddle proud all wins make us greater some how....

If all the qbs are gone im going with best positional value. from what i have seen the differnce between surtain and the next cb is razor thin. We lack a legit redzone weapon and TE Im all on the pitts train at that point.

I express my opinion never applied to be a gm. Im not here to suck up to the masses and sugar coat anything. Who are you anyway new guy? I dont even know why i have to address you in this way.

i concur sir. it was one game.

in the way they didnt get fined or in trouble for it, and they are picking ahead of us ended up able to parley that pick into more draft picks. worked out well to me.

listen to what u said miami didnt tank lol. they traded away their first round pick tackle, they traded away their all pro saftey fitz they absolutely tanked... what are you saying

philly did it... turned out well for them, say i want to see what we have in walker and not be stuck in this no win situation. Literally one gm. I bad play call anything yes, me i would have coached for draft position.

You and this vag envy? you need a hobby besides pornhub.

remember that moral victory yall cheered for late in the season the one that took us from what 3-4 to here... yeah this is what it costs... but hey da wenz in da culture...

Kyle pitts... Sewell if we not going qb