micnificent28

Im open to trading back on two conditions.... Pitts isnt there or Sewell... everyone else i would take the deal. Remember this is a rare class at the top. the only reason we even discussing Pitts and Sewell and players like chase so on this low is because there is such a heavy qb class at the top. you wont have a chance at this caliber players very often if your not picking top 5.

Likely??? I think it means they would like to. But it seems if someone wants to trade up for a qb it would be before us at 7 to call our bluff.

he's one of the few... if the only. most are iffy on slater top 10.

no one wants bpa at this point the huddle is all in on tackle

It is a luxury but only in the short term off what you just suggested. If we are losing one for sure next year you reset the clock. It's not like we don't have options at LT, Erving, little, daily and mov we moton to a degree. We could get a good LT in the second. My point is if the grades are close you go with the BPA. I DONT think slater and chase are that close. Not that I want chase.. Pitts or sewell are my 1a 1b. After that then I consider chase. Just don't see slater as a hof talent.

A good LT isn't necessarily good. We don't know how good that is. Good could turn into average.. I don't want average vs hof. Yes positional value but the same could be said for better WR. If their grades aren't even close you go with the grade. I assume chase is miles ahead of slater.

A lot of you want to bargin bin hunt on wrs which i get, but I dont want to pass on a hof caliber talent like Chase for a maybe good LT like Slater... He played well vs Chase young is all i hear but what else...Give me the more talent players and i will bargin on the position with a deeper base pool after that.

this song was fire

If all those guys are gone I honestly go Chase... BPA with only one year on Anderson contract left take a top 4 player in the draft and set your wr core up for the next few years.

Most likely. But it looks like they plugging possible holes so they can draft bpa similar to what we are.

I'm not sure if he is significant enough to say no to Pitts, but I'm assuming he didn't take the job without assurances he wouldn't be tossed to the side. It could give minimum insight into the Bengals thinking tackle at 5. What say you?

I love pitts... he is who I want in my mind.. but in my heart I know we need sewell more so. Hes generational in terms of tackles and is only 20. He is the Pitts of tackles. We keep replaces tackles every season. End the struggle at LT.

I don't think WR is on the staffs mind. I mean hes a wonderful player but, with the holes at tackle te or even corner on defense.. I think they would go that route.

This is the correct answer in either order.

Late rounder rarely amount to anything... at best your looking to get the guy the jags are moving on for Lawrence.. tough to target a late round sleeper and project starter.

I'm a Pitts believer. If you think he is generational, and sewell and slater are just good, go with Pitts first online second. Class deep at tackle take the rarer talent first. Don't just force a need because it's been so long.

I mean it's a better solution than trading 3 first for a risk anyway....

I think the only bad pick to be made would be jones... of course I would rather have fields... maybe lance, pitts after that sewell.

this is the correct answer

No

I love sewell, and would be good with drafting him. The thing is Pitts is a once in 20 years guy, I hear the wr have been kicking the tackle problem done the road argument and that's right. But.. class is deep there. We also haven't really had a Redzone weapon..since I guess Benjamin? PItts has the longest reach ever recorded.. comes down to so you think sewell is a generation tackle and not Jack fisher one of those types.

The huddle is crazy... no to Pitts lol

Just saying

Thats why he is projected to go that high. He isnt the conventional tight end more a weapon/wr te