Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dexter re-watch


Chimera

Recommended Posts

I still have the last episode of s6 to go. the first half was terrible, but once the Brother Sam story was over it got better. 

 

I really thought s1 was not very good tho...I kept thinking, if I stop watching this now I wouldn't miss it at all....but since I had already downloaded them and s2, might as well keep watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought S6 went downhill after Brother Sam died. I think I know what the writers tried to do with that season, but failed miserably. Isaak was easily the best character from the last several seasons. Louis was the most disappointing character.

I mean, he had such an incredible mystique and build-up, only to die pointlessly on Dexter's boat. I get the actor had other obligations, but come on.

 

Its still a good show overall. Nobody will disagree about the change in quality. I started this thread mostly because rewatching season 5 changed my opinion almost 180 degrees on at least that season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have the last episode of s6 to go. the first half was terrible, but once the Brother Sam story was over it got better. 

 

I really thought s1 was not very good tho...I kept thinking, if I stop watching this now I wouldn't miss it at all....but since I had already downloaded them and s2, might as well keep watching.

 

 

season 1 did not age well.   but at the time it was great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

season 1 did not age well. but at the time it was great.

I agree, but not just that season...the whole show. I am rewatching both Dexter and The Wire simultaneously and while Dexter is still a good show I question why I thought it was a great one.

Sent from my XT1049 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...