Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2-0 vs NFC, 1-0 NFCS


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

Y'know, now that my brain has caught up with my body, the original point...we are very much alive in the south, even after 2 straight blowout losses.  Falcons and Saints were just both blown out by far worse teams than the ravens.  We have the best win of the bunch against the Lions (not as impressive as atlanta's TB thrashing, but it was the best win in regards of opponent).  We need TD back, and we have some hope of Frank Alexander stepping up.  Our defense is not as bad as it has shown the last 2 weeks.  Our O-line still needs to be addressed, some money got freed up by CJ's contract, we need to do something, anything to get us some better line play because the line will have to establish our run game because we don't have the backs to make their own holes.  I know people wonder why everyone isn't pounding on the defense like we are on the offense, but it seems that between Rivera and Mcdermott we will get that side of the ball back on track, I don't think ANYONE has faith that Shula will get the Offense trending in the correct direction.  This is a big week, Chicago is vulnerable, we're at home and we need to get this right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...