Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should I sell high?


WhoAmI?

Recommended Posts

That's tough cause Moreno was doing well before he got hurt. Lamar is definitely at his most valued now tho.

What was Moreno's injury? If leg/foot or something nagging I'd maybe hang on to Lamar, if not, sell high.

 

I know, and he will definitely steal some touches when he gets back. But MIller has been looking good and will continue to get a lot of opportunies even when Moreno comes back. Oh, and his injury was his elbow, in which he won't be back until week 8. Can elbows be a nagging problem? But yeah, I'm leaning towards selling high to someone with a struggling RB 2 like a Zac Stacy or Reggie Bush. Since Lamar Miller is playing good and pretty valuable at the time, they might take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, and he will definitely steal some touches when he gets back. But MIller has been looking good and will continue to get a lot of opportunies even when Moreno comes back. Oh, and his injury was his elbow, in which he won't be back until week 8. Can elbows be a nagging problem? But yeah, I'm leaning towards selling high to someone with a struggling RB 2 like a Zac Stacy or Reggie Bush. Since Lamar Miller is playing good and pretty valuable at the time, they might take it.

What do you think ab Andre Ellington and Brandin Cooks (my team) for Gronk and welker?

My TEs now are jordan reed and Niles Paul and rbs are Andre, vereen, McCoy and Ingram (hurt 3ish more weeks).

Quoted ya just to get your attention haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think ab Andre Ellington and Brandin Cooks (my team) for Gronk and welker?

My TEs now are jordan reed and Niles Paul and rbs are Andre, vereen, McCoy and Ingram (hurt 3ish more weeks).

Quoted ya just to get your attention haha

 

Me personally, I wouldn't do it. But that's only because I value RB's high. I think Ellington is going to be a Gio Bernard type player. Weker is losing serious targets to Sanders. That Gronk element is enticing though. However, that passing offense has been looking putrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...