Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to sell that theater?


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

Netflix trying to change how first run movies are delivered to the public.

 

Yes I'd rather see a movie on my 60" Plasma then in a theater.

 

 

Adam Sandler will produce and star in four movies that will be seen exclusively on Netflix starting in 2015. The news comes just days after the streaming service infuriated theater owners with plans to release aCrouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon sequel for subs the same day it hits theaters next summer.

The math behind the film industry is notoriously flaky. As with anything rooted in art — and, yes, Adam Sandler movies are art — it’s impossible to put an exact price tag on the moods, feelings or loyalty it inspires. Movie references are the lingua franca of entire generations.Greed is Good defines Wall Street as a concept and film title more than a quarter century after the movie came out in December of 1987, just two months after the crash.

Users love free content, Wall Street loves to romanticize itself in film, and Hollywood digs money, but someone has to pick up the tab. This week the chains that account for about two-thirds of the 400 IMAX screens in the U.S. said they wouldn’t take part in the Crouching Tiger… release. For that matter, Adam Sandler is beloved, but that doesn’t mean people still pay for his movies. Sandler’s production budgets run between $50 million and $80 million, give or take. That’s real money paid to working people on movie sets. It’s hard to see how Netflix is going to actually get a quarter of a billion worth out of this four-picture deal.

That’s for investors to sweat. Sandler’s comment was that he took the deal “for one reason and one reason only … because Netflix rhymes with Wet Chicks. Let the streaming begin!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's going to take time to really evaluate new ownership. I still have some hopes that they can get us past the curse of the Jordan years. We got screwed over by the league with the lottery yet again, nothing in this draft was ever going to make people happy after that happened. 
    • The Hornets were screwed when they lost out on the #1 pick. Outside of Cooper Flagg this was a terrible draft class full of risky prospects and red flags. Kon Knueppel likely won't ever be a superstar - or even a star, realistically - but he can be a solid contributor for a long time in the league. That's actually more than I think will end up being the case for many of these players.
    • I guess we should disregard what all these places say about our draft? And just trust you guys on this board? And as far as the Mark Williams trade, most places are saying we got the much better end of that trade for what its worth to yall. Bleacher report has Kon a "B", BR has him C+, Fansided A-, NBC Sports overall draft an A-, Sports Illustrated overall A-, MSN has Kon a B+, Yahoo Sports has us at an A- overall. Here is what ESPN posted:  Post-Draft Analysis Knueppel's well-rounded perimeter game and terrific 3-point shooting ultimately won out in Charlotte's decision process, with the Hornets attracted to his fit with their current roster and his long-term potential. He should help stabilize their perimeter minutes immediately, with his dependability all season at Duke a major selling point. The Hornets were thought to be exploring moves here, but were content to simply grab their guy and move forward. This is a strong match that should pay off right away for both sides. -- Jeremy Woo
×
×
  • Create New...