Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mid season optimistic/pessimistic for the NFC South


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

Buccaneers

Optimistic: Outside of games in Atlanta and Baltimore, the Buccaneers have been competitive; and, even after a 1-6 start, sit just two games out of first place in the NFC South.

Pessimistic: Tampa Bay’s big free agent signings have proven to be bad investments, and now the team is locked into paying low-impact players a lot of money for the next few seasons.

Falcons

Optimistic: The Falcons are still in the race for the division, and with the talent on the roster, they could be a coaching change away from turning things around.

Pessimistic: Atlanta has a lot of talent, but all of it is on the offensive side of the ball. And the injuries along the offensive line have limited their biggest strength: the down-field passing game.

Panthers

Optimistic: The Panthers are still in first place in the NFC South, and the defense is too talented to continue playing the type of football that has it ranked at the bottom of the NFL.

Pessimistic: Greg Hardy, the key to the team’s defensive success last season, isn’t likely to return with his domestic violence trial looming. And the offensive personnel surrounding QB Cam Newton is too limited to make up for a below average defense.

Saints

Optimistic: The Saints will play for first place in the division on Thursday in Charlotte after a rough start. The team sits at 3-4 but three of those losses were by a field goal or less.

Pessimistic: The Saints are still a mess on the road, and the slow start has ended any hopes of them getting homefield advantage in the playoffs.

 

 

http://q.usatoday.com/2014/10/28/one-reason-to-hope-one-reason-to-worry-for-each-nfl-team/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...