-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
It can still be enjoyable. I don't think the players are in on it. I mean, I think they probably understand the "business" but they are trying. So it's fun to watch them. But I admit I'm not even close to emotionally invested as I was before the SB50. It also just happens it's usually on a Sunday and I don't have much going on anyway. I really think it's just one head ref that can push a game the way he wants it from instructions from the man upstairs. Why else do they keep bad refs? I don't think it always works out when they try to push the game though but more often than not it works. Sometimes a team can beat the refs and the opposing team but it's rare. -
By SmokinwithWilly · Posted
There was a game many years ago, I want to say it was GB and Atl when one team went for 2 with 2 seconds to go up by 4. They converted. The only thing this did was cover the spread and saved Vegas from losing 300 million. It made no sense to the point the announcers were calling it out and were pointing out covering the spread. I was a much younger guy then, but that was my first clue that there was outside influence in this game. -
By PantherChris · Posted
It's definitely a cap dump we have plenty of lower quality prospects to trade them without giving up a Blake,Nadaeu or FUS 2C has been our biggest hole since Trockek walked..... I think a Hertl is far more impact full for us than marner.... we have a ton of talented young wings Blake probably becomes a 25-30 goal guy this year and I'm pretty sure Nadeau breaks into the lineup (and his offensive ceiling is higher than Blake') not having a legit 2C has made us basically a one line team when it comes to offense. 2C and 1RHD Id like filled this month and leave space for moves at the deadline
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.