Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#2 Seed if we lose to Giants and beat Saints?


pantherbiker

Recommended Posts

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is true but i would rather have homefield advantage you know since we are 8-0 at home this year, that is always better then going to meadowlands for nfc championship game...Plus #1 seed gets the weaker of the wild card teams which may help us also but may not be good because it could either be falcons or cowboys...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that in a REAL CRAZY sense - At least if we did lose to the Giants we'd have much more revenge motivation for beating them in the playoffs when it mattered the most. (But rather play them at our house). I am real afraid of facing the Giants twice. Beating them twice would seem nearly impossible. Hopefully we will beat them the first time and won't have to play them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather us beat the giants and lock in the home field. That way we would at least be playing the giants at our house if we were to meet again. I think our fans are much better this year than they have been in the past. The tampa bay game was the most enjoyable game I've been to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Also, we are the number two seed if Atlanta, Tampa, and Minnesota lose one game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...