Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#2 Seed if we lose to Giants and beat Saints?


pantherbiker

Recommended Posts

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is true but i would rather have homefield advantage you know since we are 8-0 at home this year, that is always better then going to meadowlands for nfc championship game...Plus #1 seed gets the weaker of the wild card teams which may help us also but may not be good because it could either be falcons or cowboys...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that in a REAL CRAZY sense - At least if we did lose to the Giants we'd have much more revenge motivation for beating them in the playoffs when it mattered the most. (But rather play them at our house). I am real afraid of facing the Giants twice. Beating them twice would seem nearly impossible. Hopefully we will beat them the first time and won't have to play them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather us beat the giants and lock in the home field. That way we would at least be playing the giants at our house if we were to meet again. I think our fans are much better this year than they have been in the past. The tampa bay game was the most enjoyable game I've been to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of the three (Dal, Atl, Tam) lose any of their next two we're in automatically.

If both ATL and Tampa lose at least one game, we win the division regardless of what we do.

If we lose to NY but beat New Orleans we win the division, secure the # 2 seed and home field advantage against everyone but NY regardless of what the other guys do.

If we beat the Giants we win the division, secure the # 1 seed and home field advantage throughout regardless of what the other guys do.

Also, we are the number two seed if Atlanta, Tampa, and Minnesota lose one game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we guaranteed the #2 seed if we lose to the Giants and beat the Saints? Don't we get a first round bye with the #2 seed and a playoff game at home? If so then this may still not be that bad, because if the Giants get homefield, and happen to lose in the playoffs, then we could get homefield since they'd be eliminated. Either way we'll be setting pretty if I am correct.:D

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...