Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TOP 300 Draft Prospects: NFL.com grades & projected round, BY POSITION. (color-coded "cheat sheets")


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

I remember data and information better when I work with it myself rather than just read something.  I've been noticing the draft seems top-heavy on defense, and I wanted to see if my perception was accurate.  So, I used the NFL.com draft tracker draft grades and created a ranking of the top 300 prospects.  (Basically grades 5.1 and higher)  I then created rough cut off points for the different rounds using the various grades & rankings. (Again these are ROUGH cut offs). 

I then sorted the entire list by position to create "cheat sheets" or quick guides to see what rounds have players at various positions.  The cheat sheets follow below, but here are some take aways.  Of course these are based on the NFL.com grades.  Dave Gettleman's grades of various players could be very different...,

  • Don't look for a center or a safety before round 2.  None rank above #50.
  • Safeties.  I know it's a position of need/interest.  Could be tricky:  0 with round 1 grades; 2 with round 2 grades; 6 with round 3 grades...
  • DTs are ABSOLUTELY STACKED in round 1 (8 of the top 30 players are DTs), but there are also solid numbers of DTs in later rounds.
  • OTs are VERY top heavy - half of the OTs will likely be gone in rounds 1 & 2 (7 ranked in top 70, then only 4 from 70 - 220)
  • OGs:  the heaviest concentration is in rounds 2 and 3 (a full 50% of the guards available in the top 300)
  • The TE class is very thin and bottom-heavy with only 4 TEs in the top 125 prospects; and 10 from #125-300 (almost all of whom are projected in rounds 6 & 7)
  • Round 3 is the most-likely place for CBs: 10 are ranked from #66 - #104.
  • DEs are pretty well spaced throughout the draft: 8 in rounds 1&2 ; 8 in rounds 3&4; 8 in rounds 5&6
  • RBs too are quite evenly spaced throughout the different rounds of the draft.
  • WRs:  A small but solid group is available in rounds 1 & 2, (8 in the top 60) then there's quite a big drop off until late in round 4 (only 2 WRs from 61 - 120)
  • Pity the teams looking for a middle LBVERY VERY slim pickings.  Only 3 with round 1 - 4 grades.
  • OLBs: quite a good number in rounds 1&2.  Hardly any with round 3 & 4 grades.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To make it easier to quickly visualize the info, I created a color code for various rounds of the draft (in fact I divided up rounds 1 & 2 into 3 levels each)  as follows:

grade     projected round   # of prospects

player grades - color code.png

The grades and rankings are NFL.com's as of today, April 3.  (The rankings are compiled by sorting the grades from highest to lowest).

The "projected rounds" are my own rough division based on player grade & ranking, - note: the projected rounds are NOT based on mock drafts or expected team needs.  Obviously a run on a certain position could significantly change the draft order.   The rounds are a bit uneven in terms of numbers, but it gives a fairly good idea of relative value.

In his 3 drafts so far, Dave Gettleman has not drafted a player graded below 5.2 on the NFL.com grading scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OFFENSIVE LINE:

rank        player                                     pos   ht     wt       school                            grade     proj round

centers.png

 

guards.png

 

tackles.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QBs / RBs / TEs:   (I'll post WRs separately since it's a long list)

rank        player                                    pos     ht     wt        school                          grade     proj round

QBs.png

 

RBs.png

TEs.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stirs said:

Makes me think the following:

1st  E Ogbah DE

2nd  K Clark DT

3rd  A Burns CB

4th  KJ Dillon S

5th  M Boehringer WR

7th  B Shell  OT

Not a bad list.  Given that there seem to be some solid DTs in rounds 3 & 4, I might make an OT a higher priority if we could snag Shon Coleman or Spriggs in the 2nd.  But I confess I don't know much about the late round OTs.  Perhaps there's a good steal to be had...

Given the drop off in the mid rounds at some positions which we're likely most interested in, I could definitely see DG trying to trade up in the 2nd or 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be overkill and may cause people to go insane from too much color.... (sorry in advance!)..... but just in case it's helpful, below are the breakdowns for rounds 1 - 4 (the top 150 - 160 prospects in the draft), with each position color coded.  I see patterns more clearly by doing this kind of breakdown and color coding.

In round 1:  DEFENSE overwhelms.  61% of the top 33 prospects are on the defensive side of the ball. You see all the D-Line - GREEN - (DEs / DTs) with round 1 grades/rankings - esp from about 16 - 30.  [14 of 33 or 42% of players with round 1 grades are Dline prospects]

In round 2:  There's a lot more diversity.  In this round, the grades & rankings slightly prioritize offense (54%). There are 8 Olinemen in this round (22%) and also a good chunk of WRs, RBs and TEs.

In round 3:  the DBs (AQUA & LIGHT BLUE) dominate the list.  33% of the grades in this round go to CBs and Safeties.

In round 4:  WRs & QBs are predominant, with a sea of pink and red.  40% of the players with round 4 grades are WRs or QBs.

 

Here's the color code I used for the positions:

color_code.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
    • Well, seeing as we play the Lions at home this year, pretty sure that rumor isn't true.
×
×
  • Create New...