Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouting The Vikings

Kevin Greene

By Kevin Greene,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Vikesfan said:

I'm not sure what I said that got everyone thinking I think my team is on beatable.

Think you mean unbeatable. As for what you said, doesn't take much. It's a forum and you're in enemy territory.

 

7 minutes ago, Vikesfan said:

im probably telling you guys about players you know nothing about. 

Next time you're wondering about that "I'm not sure what I said" deal......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vikesfan Newbie

Vikesfan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, uncfan888 said:

I've always wondered what a team with zero holes and pro bowlers everywhere looks like.  Now we know

We have JAGs at SS, DT and LCB. W3 have invested heavily into the Defense for the past 3 years. As a result our Oline is thrash.

NT- big FA contract in 2014.

DT - 1st rounder

3rd rounder at DE to go with our veterens

1st and 2nd rounders at LB. 

2 first round CBs and a 2nd in Alexander

1st rounder in Smith and a nobody at SS. 

Thats a lot of top 3 rounds talent over 11 positions. Yes we have holes but not many. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vikesfan Newbie

Vikesfan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, caatfan said:

Think you mean unbeatable. As for what you said, doesn't take much. It's a forum and you're in enemy territory.

 

Next time you're wondering about that "I'm not sure what I said" deal......

Yeah was using speech to text in the car. And yes, I am telling some of you guhs about players that arent household names. The average fan isnt exactly scoping out the intricacies of teams outside their division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vikesfan Newbie

Vikesfan

Posted
Posted

Can someone give me a breakdown of the Pathers. I am interested in your Oline. I know some of the known commodities but I would like a break down of individual players strengths and weaknesses on the Oline. How has Remmers looked? Has he bounced back from the SB?

Has Ginn picked up from last year. I am going to go back and watch your two games this week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

So from what I'm reading, y'all have weak OL and CB play.  Well, our strengths are DT and WR [including Olsen].  Our OLine is just above average, so that should balance out your JAG DTs.  And if you're DEs are as unexperienced as you say, the read option should eat them up.  I'm honestly scared for Captain Munnerlyn when KB goes to the slot.  Speaking of, all of our WRs move around, so I'd imagine we'll eventually find a favorable match-up in your zone scheme.

I think it'll be a fun game until the 4th quarter when our DL rotation just wears out your OL and the floodgates open on your defense due to our run game wearing on them for 3 quarters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vikesfan Newbie

Vikesfan

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

Teams like the Vikings worry me. They are going to get after it and Zimmer will be putting pressure all game. This is the type of game where a pick 6 for either team can seal it


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I think it can easily be a blow out for you guys or a close win for us. Our defenses are similar but the differences in our offenses are glaring

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vikesfan Newbie

Vikesfan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dick the Butcher said:

So from what I'm reading, y'all have weak OL and CB play.  Well, our strengths are DT and WR [including Olsen].  Our OLine is just above average, so that should balance out your JAG DTs.  And if you're DEs are as unexperienced as you say, the read option should eat them up.  I'm honestly scared for Captain Munnerlyn when KB goes to the slot.  Speaking of, all of our WRs move around, so I'd imagine we'll eventually find a favorable match-up in your zone scheme.

I think it'll be a fun game until the 4th quarter when our DL rotation just wears out your OL and the floodgates open on your defense due to our run game wearing on them for 3 quarters.

That's very likely. Our Oline is a major problem. Our Qbs get touched and touched too often. Our CB play is solid. Not great not bad. Solid. Rhodes can be a great cb one game and then give up several catches the next. The key is our Dline. If they can close the deal with their rushes, we have a decent chance. Be aware that we have been looking like a turnover machine on defense this season. 4 fumbles and an Int last game. a pick 6 and fumble for a td the game prior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...