Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The defense under John Fox...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

I did some exhausting research and got some interesting statistics from our defense under John Fox's tenure as Panthers head coach. While nothing really jumps out I want you to notice two things: 1) The absolute inconsistency of the defensive statistics could be caused by tougher schedules, injuries, or just inconsistent coaching, you decide. 2) Notice the opponents Passer rating, it really definds whether a defense had a good year or bad year. Enjoy:

2002 (7-9) DC Jack Del Rio:

3rd down= 32%

PA= 5th (18)

YA= 2nd (290)

Pass= 4th (187)

Rush= 8th (103) 3.7 avg

INT= 15th (17)

Sack= 2nd (52)

Opp Passer Rating= 73.4

2003 (11-5) DC Mike Trogovac

3rd down= 34.6%

PA=10th (19)

YA= 8th (295)

Pass= 9th (197)

Rush= 11th (107) 4.0 avg

INT= 12th (16)

Sack= 7th (40)

Opp Passer Rating= 74.8

2004 (7-9) DC Same

3rd down= 46%

PA= 15th (21.2)

YA= 20th (336)

Pass= 18th (217)

Rush= 17th (119) 4.0

INT= 1st (26) weird huh?

Sack= 24th (34)

Opp Passer Rating= 72 (all the INT's messed this one up a little)

2005 (11-5) DC Same

3rd down= 41%

PA= 5th (16.2)

YA= 3rd (282)

Pass= 9th (191)

Rush= 4th (91.6) 3.6 avg

INT= 4th (23)

Sack= 7th (45)

Opp Passer Rating= 68

2006 (8-8) DC Same

3rd down= 32%

PA= 8th (19)

YA= 7th (296)

Pass= 4th (187)

Rush= 11th (103) 3.8 avg

INT= 22nd (14)

Sack= 6th (41)

Opp Passer Rating =80.8

2007 (7-9) DC Same

3rd down= 42%

PA= 15th (21.7)

YA= 16th (324)

Pass= 17th (214)

Rush= 18th (110) 3.8 avg

INT= 23rd (14)

Sack= 31st (31) Peppers' 2.5 sack season

Opp Paser Rating= 85.1

2008 (12-4) DC Same

3rd Down= 40%

PA= 12th (20.6)

YA= 18th (331)

Pass= 16th (211.7)

Rush= 20th (120)

INT= 21st (12)

Sack= 9th (37)

Opp Passer Rating= 81.4

2009 (0-2) DC Ron Meeks

3rd Down= 44%

PA= 30th (33)

YA= 15th (319)

Pass= 3rd (151)

Rush= 27th (168) 4.9 avg!!! Yikes

INT= 11th (2)

Sack= 24th (2)

Opp Passer Rating= You ready for it? Its a very troubling sign of possible things to come...if you scare easily look away now...ok here it is...

97.5!!!!!!!

This defense has to get better in every phase of the game and soon. Its troubling that we don't have many sacks, and that we are allowing so many points. 3rd down is not that big of deal because it hasn't really effected our record over the years. And that Passer Rating HAS to go down. For those of you that don't know its a rating based on yards, td's, int's, completion percentage, and I think yards per attempt, and all that is divided by like 27 or something. Very confusing but very accurate in terms of measuring a QB's effectiveness, and QB's have been very effective against our soft cover 2 defense.

Just like I discovered that average yards per play has a direct corrulation with the score so does the QB rating and how well the defense is playing (most of the time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game presents a good matchup for us because Romo has the ability to really look awful at times. If we can force him into some mistakes it won't matter what Witten, Barber and the rest do. Problem is we haven't really been forcing much of anything lately.

Wonder if the defense practices this week wanting to force Romo to play bad or hoping he plays bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just look at one statistic and it is consistent throughout: sacks. We're just not getting enough pressure on the QB anymore.

One thing I found interesting was that in 2007 we had 31 sacks for 31st in the league, yet a year later merely 6 more sacks elevated us into 9th.

Without doing ANY research to back this up, I believe the upward trend of West Coast offenses is having a marked impact on standard 4-3 defenses. Most OCs are recognising the importance of quick drops and passes, completely nullifying any standard pass rush, as the OL can counter most plays one on one to allow a quick throw. The defenses that still are effective, are th eones that try and create situations where someone has a free shot at the QB, in 3-4 Ds and other bases which utilise unexpected blitzing.

I would also hazard a guess that the reason our QB rating have gone up, is a direct indicator for having Brees in the division and now Ryan. The explosive offenses are the ones that seem to be able to nullify the pass rush and these two teams certainly do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I found interesting was that in 2007 we had 31 sacks for 31st in the league, yet a year later merely 6 more sacks elevated us into 9th.

Without doing ANY research to back this up, I believe the upward trend of West Coast offenses is having a marked impact on standard 4-3 defenses. Most OCs are recognising the importance of quick drops and passes, completely nullifying any standard pass rush, as the OL can counter most plays one on one to allow a quick throw. The defenses that still are effective, are th eones that try and create situations where someone has a free shot at the QB, in 3-4 Ds and other bases which utilise unexpected blitzing.

I would also hazard a guess that the reason our QB rating have gone up, is a direct indicator for having Brees in the division and now Ryan. The explosive offenses are the ones that seem to be able to nullify the pass rush and these two teams certainly do that.

According to NFL.com we only had 23 sacks in 07, not 31.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so will it be Witten, Williams, or Crayton that hurts us the most?

Whitten. no matter how mediocre the TE, we never cover them. when Tampa had Alex Smith, he burned us. now they have Kellen Winslow. (side track) anyway, Tony Gonzalez burned us. Im telling you, as many years as this has been a problem, it still hasn't been fixed. every single game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also have to think about the league making it easier and easier for the passing game, and it's working. Check out this video. Right now the combined passer rating for the entire league is 83.8. Are the QBs just getting better or are average QBs simply looking better? It's no secret that popular QBs are the NFLs money makers, they want to protect them as much as possible and make them the absolute center of attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so will it be Witten, Williams, or Crayton that hurts us the most?

We are currently ranked 29th in the NFL against the rush.

Marion Barber is probably going to miss the game due to an injury, however Felix Jones is going to run all over us in his place. Dallas isn't going to have to throw, and they won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...