Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Weekend guide to a higher draft pick. (Week 14)


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

I do not advocate tanking.  I will be cheering for the Panthers to whoop some Charger ass this Sunday.  However.  If you were cheering for the Panthers to improve their current draft position, these are the games in order of how much they directly affect our draft position.

Keep in mind, tie-breakers in the draft are determined by a teams strength of schedule.  The worse your SOS, the higher your pick.  Therefor, we want to cheer against any team we have played.  Especially division opponents because we play them twice, which I am sure is easy for many of you. 
 

Vikings v. Jaguars - Would give the Jags 3 wins.  Lowers our SOS.  Big impact.

Rams v. Falcons - We are currently tied with the rams at 4 wins.  There win also lowers our SOS as we play the Falcons twice.

Bears v. Lions - Gives the Bears 4 wins.

Jets v. 49ers - While both teams have worse records, the Jets winning lowers our SOS and we are more likely to overtake the 3-9 Jets than the 1-11 49ers. 

Redskins v. Eagles - Eagles have 5 wins and them beating the redskins lowers our SOS

Broncos v. Titans - Titans have 6 wins and them beating the Broncos lowers our SOS

Seahawks v. Greenbay - Packers have only 6 wins.  There winning lowers our SOS

Steelers v. Bills - Bills are 6-6 and could lose enough games to challenge our draft order

Saints v. Bucs - Saints have only 5 wins. No SOS affect

Cardinals v. Dolphins - While the cardinals winning would increase our SOS, they have 5 wins.

Bengals v. Browns - The Bengals are currently 4-7-1 and picking directly after us.  Their loss could give us cushion for a victory or two.  It is almost mathematically impossible for the Browns win 4 straight.

Houston v. Indy - This is a pickem.  Both teams are 6-6.  No affect on our SOS

Oakland vs KC - Does not matter in the slightest

Dallas v. Giants - Does not matter in the slightest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strongly disagree on the Browns/Bengals.  The Bengals winning gives us cushion in case we "win".

I'm 50/50 on the Vikings winning at this point to create more "cushion".  At worst it's a big silver lining if they do win.  I just don't see us "overtaking" the Jaguars.

Pulling for Houston-fug Luck

I don't see us overtaking the Bears.  Matt Barkley was the winning QB last week.  The Lions are by far the Panther fan choice to win the NFC, and could ruin things for the Seahawks, Falcons, Cowboys, and the rest.  I'm pulling for them.

Agree on the rest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nails said:

Strongly disagree on the Browns/Bengals.  The Bengals winning gives us cushion in case we "win".

I'm 50/50 on the Vikings winning at this point to create more "cushion".  At worst it's a big silver lining if they do win.  I just don't see us "overtaking" the Jaguars.

Pulling for Houston-fug Luck

I don't see us overtaking the Bears.  Matt Barkley was the winning QB last week.  The Lions are by far the Panther fan choice to win the NFC, and could ruin things for the Seahawks, Falcons, Cowboys, and the rest.  I'm pulling for them.

Agree on the rest.

 

You are right.  I adjusted the Bengals v. Browns outcome. 
 

The Vikings currently have a 2 game lead on us.  I think we will be alright.  The Jags have a higher SOS than us.  We would just have to tie them.  They play the Vikings, Texans, Colts, and Titans.  They could surely put together 2 wins with that schedule. 

We are one game up on the Bears.  They are getting Jeffrey back from suspension next week.  They play the Lions, Packers, Redskins, Vikings.  A tough stretch, but not impossible that they could pull one or two out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Morgan, I see a plan. No, you don't measure the GM at this point in terms of wins and losses--but we will later.  I thought Hurney sucked in free agency and was sub par after round 1 of the draft.  When Fox was a lame duck and did not inform the GM, Hurney drafted Jimmy Clausen and moved up for Armanti Edwards. He started trading away future first rounders when he got desperate (to get Otah and then drafted Everette Brown the following year)  Gettlemen was the "one-year contract" guy.  The players hated him.  Fitterer was terrible.    It is too early to tell with Morgan, so you have to look at the pieces.  Our OL was bad, now our OL is good.  WR was a weakness--now WR seems to be a strength.  DL was bad, now DL should be very good.  Pass rush was bad, we have 2 solid rookies and added Wonnum and Jones.  I think Morgan has had 2 solid drafts, especially in rounds 3-7.  He has had 2 good seasons bringing in UDFAs, imo.  The team went from terrible in 2024 to taking the two super bowl teams down to the wire late.  The energy is positive.  The wins will come.  
    • https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/04/panthers-2025-otas-dave-canales-cornerback-free-agency/84016482007/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=6840193aa1ae9c000185ac12 I have been curious about the position, wondering if Jackson, Horn, and Smith-Wade were going to be enough. The reporter asks a good question, especially in light of all the Jalen Ramsey rumors.  To me, the big questions concerned depth players Evans and Bartholomew.  As for the UDFA, I have been waiting to hear about Thornton and Reid, but there does not seem to have been a lot of urgency to draft a CB or bring in a free agent.  Morgan basically re-signed Jackson and locked up Horn.  A few highlights from the article: Canales mentioned Evans, Bartholomew, and Thornton by name.  He seems satisfied that Evans and Bartholomew are the key reserves.  Thornton, based on reading tea leaves about his comments, has flashed, but might be on the outside looking in.  Personally, in the limited action Evans and Bartholomew played last season, I was optimistic, and it seems Canales feels the same. He mentions that Smith-Wade is playing inside and outside.  If he steps up, that is good news.  It seems as though they really like Jackson because Canales seemed to focus on CB depth in his answer.  Coaches have to be careful answering questions like this one--If the coach mentions your name, great, but if he does not, it hurts morale.  If he says, "We'd like to upgrade the position" it can also hinder motivation.   Canales did not mention SDSU CB Mike Reid. IN RELATED NEWS I recently read that the Canales likes the battle between Ransom and Richardson for the other safety position beside Moehrig.  Not sure we will be upgrading that position at this time. Remember, the DBs play better when the front 7 plays better. PROJECTED DB ROSTER ENTERING CAMP CB: Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, Bartholomew, Evans--Practice Squad Candidates:  Thornton, Reid S: Moehrig, Ransom, Richardson, xxxxxx- I expect Henderson, Gifford, or Thomas (all UDFAs) will battle Scott for the final safety position.    
    • Yet the lyrics in their music has a "bad" word every other word. 
×
×
  • Create New...