Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Points off Turnovers...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

When trying to figure out what has been the biggest problem for the Panthers this season its easy to see the glaring statistic that the defense has given up 103 points this season in four games. This averages out to be 26 points per game which ranks them 26th in the league. For many of us this is unacceptable and even without the Philly game we still are giving up 22 points per game. So the defense needs to play better, tackle better, stop playing so far back on the receivers, and fire Ron Meeks, right? Wrong. One simple statistic explains everything while also pointing the finger at the true culprit of our record this year...the offense.

I went through all four games and added up the points off turnovers that have been given up this season and its unbelievable. This includes TD's scored as a direct result, the insuing drive, or off a blocked punt. I did not include the punt return for a TD because its not techincally a turnover but you get the idea. Here's what I found:

Week 1: Eagles score 38 points...21 were the result of a turnover. (punt return for TD not included)

Week 2: Falcons score 28 points...14 were the result of a turnover. (Dwill's fumble and a blocked punt).

Week 3: Cowboys score 21 points...8 were the result of a turnover. (8 because they went for two.)

Week 5: Redskins score 17 points....14 were the result of a turnover. (Jake's pick and Dwill's fumble)

So, this means that 64 of the 103 points allowed have been because of a turnover. That's 62% of the points that have been given up. Almost all of these turnovers have been accompanied by short fields and some have even scored without the defense even being on the field. (Dallas, Philly). Our defense gives up 26 points a game but the offense's turnovers have generated 16 points per game in points off turnovers.

Simply put, the offense needs to take care of the freakin ball and the defense needs to be ready to defend the short field at all times. This is something that needs to be corrected if we plan on turning it around in the next few weeks. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they played well enough to win against the Cowboys. Technically they only allowed 13 points and its tough to win in this league win the offense can't score more than 13 points. To me its strange because we are returning the same guys from last season on offense, there really is no excuse. I hate to throw out Jake as a scapegoat but defenses aren't afraid of the passing game anymore and are stacking the box and blitzing. The offensive line is another area of concern and should be playing much better than they are. If we can go a game or two without a turnover it will be interesting to see how the defense plays and how many points they allow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...