Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tell me if you think this trade is even


Killa Cam 69

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Killa Cam 69 said:

Yeah I couldn’t wrap my head around it the guy that got cam Evans and Elliot is in fourth the go who got shafted is in ninth in a 12 man league.. I’m all for trades and of coarse they will never be perfect but I couldn’t believe it went through no problem 

It's a trade that doesn't look very smart but if there isn't any collusion, no reason to cancel it IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2018 at 4:59 PM, Killa Cam 69 said:

Eziquel Elliot cam newton and mike Evans for McCaffrey Jon brown and Kerryon Jonson... 

Maybe it depends on scoring format but in my league Cam is the #4 QB and only 4 points behind Luck for #3 and Luck is on a Bye so Cam Newton will pass him. Zeke is RB#9 in my league. McCaffrey is RB#10, only .5 points behind Zeke. Kerryon Johnson is RB#27. Mike Evans is WR#10. Brown is WR#16. 

So one way to view the trade is:

Player A is giving up QB3, RB9 and WR10

Player B is giving up RB10, RB27 and WR16. 

A second way"

Player A is losing 17.5 points for Evans to Brown. 

Player A is losing .5 points for Zeke to McCaffery

Player A is losing 89.5 points for Cam to Johnson. 

Not sure what the format is in your league but unless player A has Mahomes or Ryan it seems like a stupid trade just to get rid of Cam in this. Zeke and CMC are a wash. Evans to brown is a massive downgrade as well. At no point is this dude winning and I would start to suspect collusion if this is a pay league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like a lot of things in today's economy, market concentration is a huge issue in the vet space. Mars (yeah, the chocolate company) owns roughly half of them with their control of Banfield and VCA as well as numerous smaller chains. Oh, and all that Royal Canon food the vets are prescribing and recommending? Yeah, that's owned by Mars too. Don't even get me started on the racket that is "prescription" dog food and how incredibly uneducated the average vet is on basic pet nutrition. Back to the actual clinics... private equity ghouls who care about literally nothing but profit own another 30%. Now you're down to roughly 20-25% of clinics that aren't under the thumb of Mars or private equity.
    • I just listened to Devil in the Desert.  😳
    • like any profession, a lot of them are very greedy and balloon up bills.  My buddy is a vet.   When he was first starting out he had BIG issues with the vet he was employed with because he was expected to drive up bills.    He now owns his own practice driven by that very reason.  Good man that wants to sleep good at night....doing what he set out to do at a young age (with the same reason in mind, to help animals and people).  But per him, a HUGE % of small animal vets are just gouging the f out of people.  like most things, I want the most mom and pop variety I can find.  The bigger practice, like most businesses, it more likely is owned and operated to make as much money as possible at the end of the day. 
×
×
  • Create New...