Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

By the #'s


ncfan

Recommended Posts

 

Offensive efficiency was close to the same minus the sacks

Passing

Cam 23-29

Big Ben 23-27

 

Yards per Rush 

Panthers 4.3

Steelers 4.6

 

 

I feel we panicked early.

After the Cam Pick 6 followed by the 3 and out and them scoring putting us down 14

From 4:35 left through the whole 2nd quarter, CMC had 2 rushing attempts and Samuel had a reverse.  We completely abandoned the run after it really set up our first TD

 

 

The 1 main difference in the 2 offenses 

We hit the QB twice for 1 sack. (Rushing 2-3 isnt going to get you to the QB

They hit Cam 7 times for 5 sacks (abandoning the run didnt help the pass rush)

 

Other stat 3rd down efficiency 

Panthers 4-11

Steelers 8-11 (rushing 2 on 3rd and 3, TD 10 yards off Switer on 3rd and 4, we were doomed woth the play calling)

 

They had 10 drives, we had 11

We had the ball 29 min

They had it 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ncfan said:

 

Offensive efficiency was close to the same minus the sacks

Passing

Cam 23-29

Big Ben 23-27

 

Yards per Rush 

Panthers 4.3

Steelers 4.6

 

 

I feel we panicked early.

After the Cam Pick 6 followed by the 3 and out and them scoring putting us down 14

From 4:35 left through the whole 2nd quarter, CMC had 2 rushing attempts and Samuel had a reverse.  We completely abandoned the run after it really set up our first TD

 

 

The 1 main difference in the 2 offenses 

We hit the QB twice for 1 sack. (Rushing 2-3 isnt going to get you to the QB

They hit Cam 7 times for 5 sacks (abandoning the run didnt help the pass rush)

 

Other stat 3rd down efficiency 

Panthers 4-11

Steelers 8-11 (rushing 2 on 3rd and 3, TD 10 yards off Switer on 3rd and 4, we were doomed woth the play calling)

 

They had 10 drives, we had 11

We had the ball 29 min

They had it 30

We only lost the time of possession by ONE minute!  Ron should be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...