Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

By the #'s


ncfan

Recommended Posts

 

Offensive efficiency was close to the same minus the sacks

Passing

Cam 23-29

Big Ben 23-27

 

Yards per Rush 

Panthers 4.3

Steelers 4.6

 

 

I feel we panicked early.

After the Cam Pick 6 followed by the 3 and out and them scoring putting us down 14

From 4:35 left through the whole 2nd quarter, CMC had 2 rushing attempts and Samuel had a reverse.  We completely abandoned the run after it really set up our first TD

 

 

The 1 main difference in the 2 offenses 

We hit the QB twice for 1 sack. (Rushing 2-3 isnt going to get you to the QB

They hit Cam 7 times for 5 sacks (abandoning the run didnt help the pass rush)

 

Other stat 3rd down efficiency 

Panthers 4-11

Steelers 8-11 (rushing 2 on 3rd and 3, TD 10 yards off Switer on 3rd and 4, we were doomed woth the play calling)

 

They had 10 drives, we had 11

We had the ball 29 min

They had it 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ncfan said:

 

Offensive efficiency was close to the same minus the sacks

Passing

Cam 23-29

Big Ben 23-27

 

Yards per Rush 

Panthers 4.3

Steelers 4.6

 

 

I feel we panicked early.

After the Cam Pick 6 followed by the 3 and out and them scoring putting us down 14

From 4:35 left through the whole 2nd quarter, CMC had 2 rushing attempts and Samuel had a reverse.  We completely abandoned the run after it really set up our first TD

 

 

The 1 main difference in the 2 offenses 

We hit the QB twice for 1 sack. (Rushing 2-3 isnt going to get you to the QB

They hit Cam 7 times for 5 sacks (abandoning the run didnt help the pass rush)

 

Other stat 3rd down efficiency 

Panthers 4-11

Steelers 8-11 (rushing 2 on 3rd and 3, TD 10 yards off Switer on 3rd and 4, we were doomed woth the play calling)

 

They had 10 drives, we had 11

We had the ball 29 min

They had it 30

We only lost the time of possession by ONE minute!  Ron should be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...