Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gunslinger or Game Manager?

Cyberjag

By Cyberjag,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

Delhomme is a gunslinger. He's not a game manager, and never has been (nor should he be) :nonod:

You're going to have to come up with some definitions we agree on, because as far as I'm concerned you couldn't be more mistaken here. I think this is an interesting enough discussion to merit it's own topic.

Most quarterbacks are characterized as either gunslingers or game managers. I think on that we can agree. Any quarterback, regardless of whether you characterize him as a gunslinger or a game manager, can throw a lot of interceptions and stink up the joint. I think on that we can agree as well. And no quarterback is 100% in either category 100% of the time.

So people say you're either a gunslinger or a game manager, you can play great or you can suck, and it's a tendency and not a strict definition.

With that, let's look what what each one looks like. And this post just defines the terms in my world, I think the whole purpose of this thread should be to get the definition out there so we're all on the same page.

First of all, to quote Bill Polian, "Every quarterback is a game manager, it's what the job is all about." Every quarterback is a game manager. Think about that for a minute. That means that if you're a gunslinger, it's built on a foundation of game management. So at some point, you cross a line where you're considered more of a gunslinger than a game manager.

Game management is fundamental. You can't have your quarterback out there doing whatever the hell he wants, he has to read the defense, manage the clock, call out plays, call audibles based on what he sees, and tell the offense what's going to happen. The quarterback's primary and fundamental job is to manage the offense. Good ones also provide a lot of presence and leadership, but that's still part of the basic job.

What makes a Gunslinger? Rather, what earns you the title of Gunslinger? Well, a lot of football glossaries give a pretty simple definition--a quarterback who plays with an aggressive and decisive manner by throwing a lot of deep, risky passes. But that's oversimplifying things. Does that definition mean that any quarterback out there who chucks up a few 30 yard bombs a game is a gunslinger? That would encompass 90% of the quarterbacks in the league. Especially when you're looking at the fourth quarter.

To be a gunslinger, you need to be aggressive. Check. You need to be decisive. Check. You need to be willing to take risks. Check. But there's more to that, isn't there? You need to throw a lot, and you need to be the kind of quarterback who thinks pass first, run second. How many gunslingers are content to throw it 15-20 times a game? You need to be willing to toss it down the field at any time, and you need to look at rifling the ball into coverage on a frozen rope. There's that confidence. Most of all, you need to look to put the outcome of the game on your arm from the opening whistle, to let the run complement your passing and to have the "I'm outscoring the other guy" mentality. That's your gunslinger--an aggressive, decisive, prolific risk taker who takes it on himself to decide the outcome of the game.

A game manager is someone who just takes the fundamental responsibility of the quarterback and plays within it. This guy is more of a team player in the classic sense. As Polian said, every QB is a game manager. That's how you start your career, you go out there and hand the ball off and trust your defense. Game manager is often used to describe an aging QB who's lost a little, or one that doesn't throw for a lot of yards TDs. And its important to note that just because you're managing the game, you're not immune to bad decision making or turning the ball over. Every QB in the league does that, and some do it a lot more than others. And just because you're a game manager, you're not limited to 20 five yard passes per game--you're allowed to air it out.

When Brett Favre started out in Green Bay, he managed the game--hand the ball off to Vince Workman and Darrell Thompson and trust his defense (easy to do when you have Reggie White, right?). Then as he gained experience, he became the identity of first the offense and then the team, and he established his gunslinger credentials. Go look at his passing statistics in his Green Bay years, they take a real jump after his first two years in the league. And go look at him now, is he still playing like a gunslinger or is he back to fundamental game management?

Gunslingers are bold, decisive, aggressive, and consistent at it. You're talking about raising your passing game to another level when you become one. They earn the title because they're able to go very vertical very successfully and sustain it. They put the ball 30 yards down the field where only their guy can get it over and over, because they can. They earn it because they can throw 30-40 times a game with regularity and make defenses suffer, even though everyone knows it's going to be a pass. We're talking about Brady, Manning, Warner, and Brees types of guys right now.

Speaking of Warner, he aired it out in St. Louis and earned his Gunslinger credentials as the leader of the Greatest Show on Turf. Then he went to New York and got hurt and managed the game for a few years before rediscovering his arm in Arizona. Then you have guys like Phillip Rivers, who seem to be on the verge of being able to pass with alacrity, caring little for what the defense wants to do and imposing his own will on the game. I can't think of a single gunslinger out there who hasn't also been referred to as a Franchise Quarterback.

Then you have quarterbacks who turn the ball over a lot because of stupid decisions or poor accuracy. That's not a gunslinger, it's a bad quarterback or a good quarterback playing poorly. And a game manager who consistently tries to play like a gunslinger rarely gets a full season to do so. An offensive coordinator who calls on his quarterback to throw the ball 30+ times per game and mixes in a lot of deep balls better hope he has a real gunslinger, or he'll end up with a lot of turnovers.

That may be what's happening in Carolina right now. Fortunately for Jake, he's got a record of success that he can fall back on. Just imagine if Jake was in his first or second year and was playing this way, would he have the same trust of the coaching staff and his fellow players? Odds are he would be looking for a new job next year. And if he continues to turn it over like he has, he still may be. And that goes for anyone who tries to play like a gunslinger but can't. True gunslingers only last if they're successful.

Jake Delhomme is successful when he relies on the running game and defense. Aside from one season in 2005, he has never, ever been able to put the entire success of the team on his arm. He plays in an offense that requires a vertical game, and he leads it well. But every time the run breaks down early and he's called on to carry the team we lose. He's a game manager in almost every sense of the word, just like most starting quarterbacks, but he's not a gunslinger because he simply lacks the skill.

That doesn't mean the OC doesn't call long plays--he does and they're part of the offense. But it's irresponsible to designate someone as a gunslinger just because they're reckless with the ball. A gunslinger is someone who can be reckless and get away with it. That's never been Jake, at least not in the first three quarters.

Looking at his stats, I readily concede that his fourth quarter rating in games where he doesn't throw more than 30 times is pretty damned impressive. And we all know how many comebacks he's engineered, and we all remember the beautiful long passes he's thrown late in games. If he could mirror his fourth quarter performances in the first three, then he would be a perennial all-pro and there would be no doubt that he would carry the gunslinger honorific.

But he can't. So he doesn't get it. And while I really like and admire Jake, I don't think it's fair to him to expect him to play like one. I would also add that to say he's a gunslinger and then turn around and say he's not any good is just kind of backwards to me. And this may give you an idea of why I'm comfortable with him right now--if Davidson stops asking him to play like someone he's not we have a great chance of winning more than we have been--isn't the consensus here that we need to run more and call higher percentage passing plays?

I would like to believe we're dealing more with a question of semantics here. Tell me what you think a gunslinger is, and what separates them from a game manager. Because if it's anything close to my definition, I think you've really missed the boat on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SMACKDAB Newbie

SMACKDAB

Posted
Posted

Can some of you geniuses tell me if you're basing the decision on anything other than the number of interceptions Jake has thrown?

Can the genius on the other end tell me how you start a thread about what Jake is, and not understand why people talk about his interceptions as of late??

WTF? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
  • Author
Posted

this post just defines the terms in my world, I think the whole purpose of this thread should be to get the definition out there so we're all on the same page.
This should make it easy for you. Don't bother reading what I wrote, just tell me what makes someone a gunslinger versus a game manager. Maybe back it up with a little explanation.

I'm sick of arguing with people who might be using a different dictionary and want to know what you're thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Game management is fundamental. You can't have your quarterback out there doing whatever the hell he wants, he has to read the defense, manage the clock, call out plays, call audibles based on what he sees, and tell the offense what's going to happen. The quarterback's primary and fundamental job is to manage the offense. Good ones also provide a lot of presence and leadership, but that's still part of the basic job.

What makes a Gunslinger? Rather, what earns you the title of Gunslinger? Well, a lot of football glossaries give a pretty simple definition--a quarterback who plays with an aggressive and decisive manner by throwing a lot of deep, risky passes. But that's oversimplifying things. Does that definition mean that any quarterback out there who chucks up a few 30 yard bombs a game is a gunslinger? That would encompass 90% of the quarterbacks in the league. Especially when you're looking at the fourth quarter.

Based on those two definitions, he is neither. He is a warm body holding the spot until we get a new QB or finally start Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Delhomme currently is neither. He is just a bad QB.

Bad QB or a QB playing bad? I think that was Gantt's question. :)

Even when he's good I don't think he's much more than a game manager, and reading my definitions I think you know why. Just curious to know if I'm on the same page as anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SMACKDAB Newbie

SMACKDAB

Posted
Posted

This should make it easy for you. Don't bother reading what I wrote, just tell me what makes someone a gunslinger versus a game manager. Maybe back it up with a little explanation.

I'm sick of arguing with people who might be using a different dictionary and want to know what you're thinking.

No...I read ALL of your post, and I understand what you are saying. At the same time you have to comprehend responses that you started with this thread.

No argument here, but you can't expect to surface this topic once again without people talking about Jake's interceptions....PERIOD! Now you want to be a temperamental ass because you don't like people's responses to a topic that has been discussed more than Jon and Kate, and their kids.

That is what my response was about, still is about, and it really doesn't matter because he sucks period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No...I read ALL of your post, and I understand what you are saying. At the same time you have to comprehend responses that you started with this thread.

No argument here, but you can't expect to surface this topic once again without people talking about Jake's interceptions....PERIOD! Now you want to be a temperamental ass because you don't like people's responses to a topic that has been discussed more than Jon and Kate, and their kids.

That is what my response was about, still is about, and it really doesn't matter because he sucks period.

Ok, I misinterpreted your response. I thought you accidentally decided to change the topic, I didn't think it was on purpose.

Jake's been throwing interceptions left and right. To me, that makes the argument that he's no gunslinger even more compelling. The fact that he's even asked to throw the ball deep at all right now just boggles my mind. It's never been his game, and I don't understand why it is now, just like I don't understand the run/pass distribution earlier this year. It's the kind of game you call when you HAVE a gunslinger, and I maintain we don't and never have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      We read each other and we bring together influences from a variety of sources--that is what makes this time of year great.  However, when you realize that the Panthers have talked to three (3) WRs expected to be there around #19, it must give us pause. We all knew about Cooper (who has been heavily mocked to the Jets at #16) and Concepcion (deemed to be the perfect Z WR based on his skill set).  Then the other day, the Panthers quietly brought in another tall WR that seems to be less than a good fit at first glance. First, a glance at the top 2 WRs the Panthers have shown interest in: Cooper (projected to Jets at 16--could possibly go as early as 9) Concepcion (considered to be a perfect fit for the Z WR (leaving Coker in the slot and TMac at X) has one major issue that has plagued the Panthers (see Legette, Xavier, TMac) in the area of drops.  Coker, on the other hand has never dropped anything in his entire life--including "in" or "by."  He can't even eavesdrop.   So, does that stat about Concepcion bother them?  It does me.  XL dropped 14% of his catchable balls as a rookie.  Last year, he found new ways to screw up, such as not knowing the boundares or lateralling to Rico for a big loss.  Yes, TMac was ROY and was terrific, but he had 8 drops, catching just under 60% of targets. Top NFL WRs are in the 70%-80% range--which is good news--it means that TMac can improve.  He caught 70 passes and dropped 8, meaning that his drop rate was about 10%.  If you are counting, Denzel Boston is another first-round WR whose stock may have dropped a bit because he did not run a 40 during his pro day.  However, I see him as the #3 or #4 WR in this draft.     Most people feel that Denzel Boston is in the TMac mold--a tall X.  Many of the same criticisms (about separation and speed) face Boston now. Although he is primarily viewed as a physical X (split end) receiver due to his 6'4", 212-pound frame, Boston has a weakness that makes him less valuable as the X but more valuable as a Z. Boston's ability to get off a jam at the LOS has been questioned--something an X does nearly every play. While his size and contested-catch ability make him a prototypical X, scouts and analysts note he has the versatility to move across the formation, including taking snaps in the Z or as a big slot, often helping to create mismatches. This would make him interchangeable with Coker.  Even if Legette does not come around, the Panthers would have a three-headed hydra at WR.  For much of last season, the Panthers had TMac, a goofy XL, and Versatility: Beyond being an X receiver, he is considered capable of playing Z or in the slot, allowing for movement across the formation. Physicality: With his size and strength, he can play on the outside, making him a strong red-zone target. Role Projection: While he primarily played on the boundary, his profile fits as a versatile receiver who can align in multiple spots to exploit matchups.  His 6-foot-4 height and 209-pound weight are ideal for an outside receiver who can play both X and Z positions at the next level.   NFL Combine write-up:  Two-year starter with elite ball skills that should supersede athletic/speed limitations. A Puka Nacua comparison might feel strong, but like Nacua, Boston enters the draft with speed/separation concerns and outstanding competitive toughness. Boston gets off the line with good burst and maintains his top speed throughout the route. He could have issues beating press, but releases can also be schemed. He’s very skilled when it comes to winning jump balls and contested throws. Boston also knows how to win in the red zone. Acclimating to NFL competition could take a year, but Boston has the makeup to become a productive possession target with above-average red-zone value.   The Panthers have looked at three Z WRs who will be first-rounders in all likelihood.  They have a proven track record of bringing in first-round picks.  The tea leaves are strong in this case.   here is Greg Cosell talking to the Bills analysts.  What he says about Boston (compares to TMac) is interesting (4:45).  https://www.buffalobills.com/video/greg-cosell-breaks-down-wr-draft-class-buffalo-bills Screen Shot:  No share available. "I don't think you have to just line him up inside (slot).  I think you can play him outside (X)."  That comment suggests he can play X, slot, or Z.  He then compares KC Concepcion vs. Boston--very different WRs.  In my view, Boston is more versatile.  Boston has excellent hands and he wins contested balls.  Red Zone--giving TMac someone on the other side of the field with the sure-handed Coker inside.  What Cosell says later (about Hurst, actually, but it applies to Concepcion): "You can teach guys to catch a ball."   He talks about Concepcion, Boston, and Cooper in succession.  I get the feeling he is less impressed with Cooper than others are because he questions the competition--based on the Indiana system vs. zone etc.  I would also say that any WR who has a good WR on the other side of the field probably gets less defensive attention. I should add that this also reflects poorly on XL, but I have said he would be a late bloomer.  I had no idea how much he did not know about football.  We shall see, but can you imaging how potent we'd be in 4 WR sets if he comes around?  How do you cover that?  (OT people are biting their lips right now) THE DRAFT It sure looks as though the Panthers are looking seriously at WR (the Z spot specifically) in the draft.  Can you see any other position that has garnered this much attention for potential day 1 players?  I cannot.   I am concerned about the OT situation, don't get me wrong, but Morgan is going to think, "I have a starter and I brought in a swing T (Forsythe).  Moton is a real concern.  We may look at RT later--and I know how others feel about it.  We could re-sign BC and he would be available after a month or two....I dunno. Less than 2 weeks to go--just thought I would take a look at WR because it seems, based on available "evidence," that a WR will be our pick....again.  
    • Swaggasaurus
      Schrader / Jeremiah mock draft experiment

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      What I liked about this was…up until pick 19 I think who is on the board is going to be close to the reality. If it fell like that I’m going KC or a tackle, offense or defense, doesn’t matter. 
    • AceMan
      Panthers Top 30 Visits and Draft Tracker

      By AceMan · Posted

      I really like this draft
×
×
  • Create New...