Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

pep..


xtheronx

Recommended Posts

Yeah, but last season he had like 4 in one game, and close to that many in another, I can't recall what games and what totals, but It was against like Detroit and some other sorry team like us!

you're proving my point for me.. thanks!

(see 4 sacks in one game)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see how many of those sacks were against teams in the bottom ten of the league.

so we're not counting sacks against the bottom teams now..??

that makes no sense..!

OMG! there are so many HATERS!!

be thankful we have such a great player! where is your logic??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know what the word sarcasm means? Did not think so since you could not spell It, nor did you think what you posted was sarcastic.

ok.. lets divert the attention to something else..

without pep.. our D would be much worse...

they should stick it to Buff this week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so we're not counting sacks against the bottom teams now..??

that makes no sense..!

OMG! there are so many HATERS!!

be thankful we have such a great player! where is your logic??

Here is my logic: He shows up in games against bad teams so he can bloat his stats. That way, morons like you will go "OMGZ LOOK AT TEH SACKZ NUMBRES! HE'Z SO GOOD!"

If you pay attention, you'll notice that he accrues most of his stats against shitty teams. I'll lay off once he starts tearing it up against the Cards, Saints, Pats, etc...But until then, he's still a lazy POS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...