Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

jobs - insurance


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

When you graduate with 4 year degree in accounting, you have 27 hours in accounting. If she takes 1 extra class (fraud)... that will give her 30 hours in accounting (business law is an accounting elective). All she need is about 7 easy classes to reach 150 hours. (this will also improve her GPA)

If she go for MACC, she have to pay and pass GMAT, pay college reentrance fee, plus she have to pay graduate tuition for 10 classes. She can take max 3 accounting classes in one semester. If she goes for MACC she will lose lots of money and lots of time.

Just saying...

The additional expense is easily made up in a few years because the average starting salary (and overall career prospects) are much better with a masters. When she worked her internship over the summer, the company she worked for wouldn't even hire you if you didn't have a masters for the Tax department. They hired some auditors with only a CPA, but they made about 20k less than those in the tax department.

I don't know much about accounting because I didn't major in it, but she tells me that it's nearly impossible to land a job with any of the big 4 without a masters degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much about accounting because I didn't major in it, but she tells me that it's nearly impossible to land a job with any of the big 4 without a masters degree.

Not true, they don't care what you have as long as you able to sit for your CPA exam when they will hire you. Who you think goes for MACC? Its not just for an accounting people but also for Economics, Finance, and other business majors. poo Tensor, you can apply for MACC too if you want too. All you need is a good GPA which you have and good GMAT score. Many MACC people have just as many classes in accounting as an average undergrad (3 more classes). I had bunch of MACC graduate students in my undergrad classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The additional expense is easily made up in a few years because the average starting salary (and overall career prospects) are much better with a masters. When she worked her internship over the summer, the company she worked for wouldn't even hire you if you didn't have a masters for the Tax department. They hired some auditors with only a CPA, but they made about 20k less than those in the tax department.

MACC might give you little advantage but not a big one tho. You wont make $100,000 with just MACC. CPA gives you big advantage cause you can actually certify. Audit always pays more than tax, I'm not sure what the deal with the company she worked for. Specially with IFRS coming up, trust me, auditors will get paid big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true, they don't care what you have as long as you able to sit for your CPA exam when they will hire you. Who you think goes for MACC? Its not just for an accounting people but also for Economics, Finance, and other business majors. poo Tensor, you can apply for MACC too if you want too. All you need is a good GPA which you have and good GMAT score. Many MACC people have just as many classes in accounting as an average undergrad (3 more classes). I had bunch of MACC graduate students in my undergrad classes.

MACC takes 2 years if you don't have an undergraduate degree in accounting. Tensor tell your friend to pass the CPA before finishing college and they won't have any problems getting into a big firm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the national average, not the rate for Charlotte. A lower % of people pass the CPA exam than the Bar exam. I have no idea what it is for UNCC, so I have no idea how it compares to the national average.

I know that one of UNCC alumni got 99% on all 4 parts last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...