Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Validated in a loss?


goodoleboy

Recommended Posts

To me this game did as much to validate us as a contender as any win we have had this season. We went toe to toe with the defending Super Bowl champ in their house. Jake answered his critics. We showed balance on O and moved the ball well against a very good Defense.

The Defense did enough to win the game in regulation. They were a bit exposed along the D line but not many teams have the O line and running game to exploit it. If they do we are a good enough O to keep up. I actually feel better about our playoff chances than I did last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard the trailer on ESPN for Dilfer's prediction of us losing the division to Atlanta.

They called us "one of the most feared teams in the NFL" I don't think that happens before our good showing on Sunday night. Same type of stuff was said about the Giants last year after the way they played the Patriots in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Go check what Baker did on 3rd down with Canales in Tampa.  He bailed a very meh offense out that season going downfield on 3rd down.  Like said, there is a deep dive thread somewhere about every stop.  There are some deep dive articles that go into the magic Baker had to pull on 3rd down that season because the O actually sucked.  Which got talked about when Canales was hired (that the O wasn't actually good, Baker was on big downs).   Geno was absurd downfield for his comeback (think he lead the NFL in deep shots that season and we know Wilson was the king of the f you deep ball) Canales needs to be paired w/ a playmaker at QB.  Just like every variant of the offenses he worked on needed to be to in order to make up for meh O schemes and meh overall playcalling. 
    • Exactly.  Just because you are part of the staff of a Head Coach doesn't make you an immediate replica of that coach once you branch out on your own.  
    • Valid, and throw in that what Wilson and Smith did is not out of the ordinary for a WCO 
×
×
  • Create New...