Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake locker


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Ok its a long shot. But at 6'2¼ 222 lbs it would prob take more of foxes ill advised trading of next years pick not to mention getting back into the first rd this year.(bye peppers)Think about it this kids been a pretty good qb his whole time at washington with the least amount of talent supporting him. The panthers wrs would actually be an upgrade as it is for him. If im going to take risk on a big time investment at qb its going to be on a guy whos done more with less, than a guy whos been overhyped by the talent around him. NFL cailber qb coach in steve starkesien(not sure if spelled right).Above average arm great leadership and wow factor scrambling ablity, but then again are the carolinas ready for another jake?????????

oh bye the way bradford is the 3rd rated qb right now if he falls past 15 i say we make the same move as we did with jeff otah.

thoughts??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What I'm saying is that he wouldn't be on my board to be drafted. He'd be on the "if these guys go undrafted, give them a call" board.
    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
×
×
  • Create New...