Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things to Watch this Preseason: Guard Play


BlackPanther22
 Share

Recommended Posts

So something I’ve seen echoed amongst Panthers twitter from those who were at camp in the past week and even more so after joint practices, is that the iOL, particularly RG and even apparently LG (according to Joe Person) have been the main source of pressure leakage with the first team OL. I think the Corbett injury is affecting more than what we realize so this preseason I’ll be watching a couple of things.

1. Who gets starting reps at RG:

- Though Cade Mays has felt like the natural replacement, I’ve read a lot recently about his struggles and even how he apparently got pulled for Justin McCray during joint practices. So, I’ll definitely be watching over the course of the next few weeks who they choose to give reps to at right guard during these preseason games. I’ll particularly be watching to see if this Nash Jensen hype is anything and if he lines up over there. 
 

2. If Zavala gets up to speed, will he push for reps at LG in the next few weeks?

- Chandler is clearly playing a bit of catch up right now after missing the first week and a half but the team seemed to really emphasize him playing next to Ickey again in the Blueprint stuff we saw. So I’ll be curious to see if towards the 2-3rd pre-season games we see them give him reps with the 1’s at LG or even RG. 
 

Those are just a couple of things I’ll be watching, especially after reading everything I have over the last few days. It can’t be stressed how important the iOL is with a smaller QB, regardless of how great I think BY is at finding throwing lanes, so I hope they figure it out before the season starts. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good stuff @BlackPanther22. On the offensive side of the ball, this is our biggest question mark. Everything else seems settled except who the #6 WR will be, and Byrd's injury pretty much settled that. FWIW, I think Mays has everything needed to be a starter at RG, at least until Corbett returns. McCray might be getting looks because he's the vet and Mays is still figuring it out. I also am a big fan of Christensen, but I think he's missing that mean streak that Zavala had at State. I don't think Zavala pushes for RG anytime soon though. I heard a lineman say one time that moving from one side of the line to the other was like wiping your ass with your left hand... it's possible, but it doesn't feel right.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep--our starting guards (eventually, imo) are not practicing.  (Zavala just started practicing ).  BC will move back to OT as depth and maybe take Moton's spot in a year when his salary explodes to $30m.

We have some good young hopefuls at G, but they are not there yet.  Mays, Jensen, and DiRenzo are very interesting prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...