Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe I'll Start Matt Moore, Muhammad, Rosario, Kenny Moore


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Yes, I am playing in my championship game. Tom Brady is my QB, but The Hoody may not let him play the whole game. I picked up Matt Moore, and I have Chad Henne. Moore could go off on a Saints secondary that has lately given up 301 yards per week, and may probably rest even more players. Henne goes against a highly motivated Steelers team. Moreover, I have Dallas Clark who was pulled last week, and Johnny Knox got hurt. I am strongly thinking about starting Rosario (or Daniel Graham or Joel Dreessen) in Clarks spot. I already picked up Jabar Gaffney who will be Denver's numero uno now that Brandon Marshall is being benched, so I am putting him in Knox's spot. The thing is is that I also had Kenny Britt, but will play either Muhsin Muhammad or Mike Wallace in my last wide-out spot. Now, I am leaning towards Wallace, but still considering Moose (and Kenneth Moore depending on Moose's status).

Of course I am keeping a close eye on the situation (esp. w/ Brady). Would you have the sones to play Matty Ice, Moose and Rosario in this situation? Do you think Moose is going to outdo Jabar Gaffney, Mike Wallace, or healthy Kenny Moore?

Decisons, decisions. Week 17 Kinda sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started Moore and Rosario, and won it all. Moore actually had more points than Brady and Henne (who got hurt). I should have left Rosario on the bench. My picking up of Jabar Gaffney pretty much put an exclamation point on my championship (though I still would have won with Moose).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...