Double Trouble on field together

[IAmLost]

Putting them both on the field completely eliminates the whole point of having them both imo. The point is to be able to rotate and not lose effectiveness with the run game by having two top tier running backs who are constantly rested.

As karasmatic444 pointed out, it's not something we would constantly line up in so I'm not sure if fatigue is a big issue here. Even if we did somehow tire them both out at the same time, we still have a back that showed some promise in Sutton to carry the ball while the others are resting.

[Guild]

Fair enough on the counter points. I would not be completely averse to trying it. Hell I've done it in Madden before

I know that means nothing... unwad you panties

[SorthNarolina]

You need to watch closer, they have done that before.

They've even had williams in the wildcat and he fakes the ball to stewart, then takes off.

Having two RBs in the formation isn't some revolutionary idea we haven't come across, they do it plenty of times.

[Baschski]

Here's something for all your guys opposing this idea to think about:

If D-Will and J-Stew are both 1,000 yard rushers, and you put the two of them on the field at the same time.....1,000 times 1,000 = 10,000 yards. You're a retard if you say no to 10,000 yards rushing.

Case closed.

[Kettle]

what were you on when you thought of that Baschski? that's one of the most ridiculous things i've read on this board.

[DirtyMagic97]

We should draft The Golden Calf of Bristol. Then we could put The Golden Calf of Bristol, Williams, Stewart AND Smith back there! It would be like the counter-spread!

Baschski; using your math, how many yards would we rush for then?

[Kettle]

We should draft The Golden Calf of Bristol. Then we could put The Golden Calf of Bristol, Williams, Stewart AND Smith back there! It would be like the counter-spread!

Baschski; using your math, how many yards would we rush for then?

trying to think like that guy briefly, not so long my brain rots. i think that math would yield 20,000. final answer.

[DirtyMagic97]

trying to think like that guy briefly, not so long my brain rots. i think that math would yield 20,000. final answer.

:eek:

Super Bowl.

[Baschski]

How about THIS:

Sign Mike Vick, he'll rush for 100 yards a game. Multiply Williams, Stewart AND Vick's rushing potential when you put them all on the field and we're looking at a 100,000 yard season. Chew on that thought, haters.

[Kettle]

10,000/16=625

this past weekend GB vs ARI totaled 1024 net yards. that was two teams, and just one crazy game. how do you think that one team will put up 625 yds a game?

[Baschski]

10,000/16=625

this past weekend GB vs ARI totaled 1024 net yards. that was two teams, and just one crazy game. how do you think that one team will put up 625 yds a game?

First of all, you're missing a zero. I said 100,000 rushing yards, not 10,000. And that's not even factoring in the 3000 that Moore is going to toss up in the air. The point is, we need to stop running this boring, non-entertaining bullcrap offense where we only run one RB at a time. It needs to be exciting in order to be successful, so we need to put D-Will and J-Stew on the field at the same time. Heck, we might as well figure out a way that they can both be carrying the ball at the same time (one with his left arm, the other with his right arm running side-by-side, that kinda thing).

[Kettle]

i went back to your original number baschski. how soon you forget the siht you spit.

[Baschski]

i went back to your original number baschski. how soon you forget the siht you spit.

Oh you're talking about the number without Vick in the equation. Well, either way, it's the dual double trouble wild cat special (DDTWCS) that's going to win us the Super Bowl next year. Mark my words.

[Kettle]