Another Matt Moore Article (Panthers.com)

[Mr. Scot]

Why wouldn't I? What meat is suggesting is totally different from you suggested. There is a zero percent chance hurney told them to write this article

Never said he did. Try reading again.

All that's necessary is a single e-mail or phone call from Hurney or Fox to David Monroe or Andrew Mason. They say something as simple as "We want to start taking the focus off of Jake Delhomme and moving it toward Matt Moore".

Essentially, a particular slant on things, not a specific article. Only difference is the guy in question (Charlie Drayton, who I mentioned in a different post but not this one). As mentioned elsewhere, the guys who actually put up the content know their jobs.

Meat's already proven you wrong, but if you're still as firmly committed to the idea that Jake will be the starter next year as you say you are, I'll give you a chance to put your money where your mouth is. Are you confident enough to bet your user title, avatar and sig on it?

[Gman was right]

Meat dodnt prove a thing and neither did you.I will bet you anything that jake goes into tc penciled in as the starter. Like I said before it will be his job to lose

[Mr. Scot]

Meat dodnt prove a thing and neither did you.I will bet you anything that jake goes into tc penciled in as the starter. Like I said before it will be his job to lose

Trying to distance yourself now,eh? Mitigate your stance with stuff like "pencilled in"

I'll give you the details of the wager later. Enough now to know that whether you choose to admit it or not, anyone reading this can see you've been proven wrong

[GreatPoupon]

gman was wrong.

[Gman was right]

How am I distancing? All I said was that its jakes job to lose. Unless he is terrible in preseason then he will start on opening day. I'm not going to bet against him stinking it up though

[GreatPoupon]

it will rain tomorrow, unless... its not cloudy. then i wont bet on rain. either way i'm right.

[Gman was right]

gman was wrong.

Unless someone can prove that hurney told mason to write this article then gman is right. Good luck with that

[GreatPoupon]

unless you can prove he didnt, you're wrong.

[Gman was right]

This was your theory so the burden of proof is on you. Good luck

[GreatPoupon]

not my theory, i'm just a causual observer.

but your statements seem less based on fact since you have absolutely zero to support your claims.

prove that he doesnt - you cant. all you have is an opinion based on nothing.

[Gman was right]

I'm not claiming anything.

[GreatPoupon]

then why are you talking?

[Gman was right]

Your claim is Christian logic. The talking snake is real until he is proven not to be. Gotta love it

[GreatPoupon]

essentially that's the stance you're taking: i'm right until proven otherwise.

hypocrit