Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Offseason Mock Draft Date Discussion


Which date?  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Which date?

    • (March 7th (1st-3rd RD.) & March 14th (4th to 7th RD.) at 8pm)
      4
    • (March 28th (1st-3rd RD.) & April 4th (4th to 7th RD.) at 8pm)
      9


Recommended Posts

Some feel that the draft date should be moved in order for GMs to see the pro days for all prospects.

I have proposed a new date. You may either vote to keep the original date (March 7th (1st-3rd RD.) & March 14th (4th to 7th RD.) at 8pm) or to vote for the new date(March 28th (1st-3rd RD.) & April 4th (4th to 7th RD.) at 8pm).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'd really honestly rather just start a thread now where teams post their picks and have it go on as long as it takes to get through the draft but set a time limit on the picks. 12 or 24 hours or something like that and if they don't pick the commish makes the pick for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'd really honestly rather just start a thread now where teams post their picks and have it go on as long as it takes to get through the draft but set a time limit on the picks. 12 or 24 hours or something like that and if they don't pick the commish makes the pick for them.

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...