Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DraftTek


Recommended Posts

I dunno if you guys do this, or even knew about it... but...

If you go to http://drafttek.com/new%20simulator/, you can change variables to your beliefs for teams' needs, project trades (put teams in place of other teams for each draft pick number), and run the draft in simulation...

It is a fun time waster this time of year, and if you tweak it enough, it can be pretty accurate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put my projected trade with Kansas City in and bump our needs for OLB and WR up... I also have us trading down in the 2nd with Seattle and picking up an extra 4th and 6th (they take Jahvid Best at 48)...

2(36). Golden Tate, WR Notre Dame

2(60). Tyson Alualu, DT California

3(78). Thad Gibson, OLB Ohio St.

4(104). Tony Pike, QB, Cincinnati

4(112). Jermaine Cunningham, DE Florida

5(136). Brandon Carter, G Texas Tech

6(175). Antonio Brown, WR Central Michigan

6(176). Walter Thurmond, CB Oregon

6(202). Leigh Tiffin, K Alabama

6(204). Terrell Skinner, SS Maryland

7(223). Cameron Sheffield, LB Troy

7(249). David Reed, WR Utah

Not bad at all... if it could only play out that way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...