Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Amar'e Stoudemire says Lamar Odom had a "lucky game"


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

by Paola Boivin, Republic columnist - May. 18, 2010 08:41 PM

The Arizona Republic

LOS ANGELES - Amar'e Stoudemire rarely cracks open the door to his psyche.

It is a defense mechanism borne out of a difficult childhood. It was obvious Tuesday, however, the Los Angeles Lakers

got to him.

"I'm not giving him no hype," Stoudemire said Tuesday about Lamar Odom's 19 points and 19 rebounds in Game 1. "He had a lucky game."

Dismissing the competition is never a good thing. Nor is revealing too much in this Internet-driven age.

Just ask Darnell Dockett.

Odom wouldn't bite. He deflected the question several times before he said, "Hopefully, I'll have another one."

Touche.

The most-interesting subplot of Game 2 at Staples Center will be how these two athletes respond to a not-so-sleepy off-day of news.

The old Stoudemire used to be prone to the occasional bout of bravado, but he has been much more careful of late, remaining upbeat during difficult contract questions and taking on more of a leadership role with the team. Sometimes the past has a way of creeping back in, however, and one can't help but wonder if Stoudemire is distracted by his mother's arrest Saturday for driving without a breath alcohol ignition-interlock device.

Stoudemire came to the scene, according to the police report, but was sent away by an officer when she started yelling his name.

I'll give him a mulligan on this one.

For what it's worth, he often is at his best when he is ticked off. His production took a leap of improvement after coach Alvin Gentry benched him in the fourth quarter against Dallas in late January.

Odom's teammates didn't take the bait, either, although they made their points.

Point guard Derek Fisher spoke of a recent interview he saw featuring Mick Jagger, who explained the Rolling Stones' long-term success.

"He talked about talent, working hard, blah blah blah, but he said there is some luck involved in being good," Fisher said. "When you're great for a long time, you have to be lucky some times."

Lakers coach Phil Jackson was more philosophical: "You make your own luck."

Jackson also knows he has to temper his praise for Odom.

Odom had a terrific game against the Suns, but he hasn't always been there this postseason. During the Lakers' first-round series against Oklahoma City, Jackson referred to Odom as "MIA."

The player agreed, saying he's "played poorly" in the postseason.

It's mystifying because of how dominant he can be, as he was Monday.

After his struggles against Oklahoma City, he seemed to turn it around against Utah, helping secure the Lakers' victory in Game 1 by following two Kobe Bryant misses with baskets in the final five minutes.

But even his improved play hasn't quelled questions about his struggles in the spring.

Some have speculated his sore shoulder is more injured than he cares to disclose.

Others suspect his high-profile marriage to Khloe Kardashian has disrupted his focus. He often hears shouts of "Mr. Kardashian" during games.

He insists neither is a big-enough distraction.

Whatever it is, the Lakers hope to see the player who recorded seven double-doubles in last year's postseason.

And wonder how he'll respond to the expectations of a performance like Game 1's.

"I'm just going to try and keep doing what I'm doing," he said Tuesday.

Jackson said Odom thrived Monday because, "He was just aggressive when he came in and tried to feel out where we needed him in the game. A lot of times that's just the way basketball is.

"We hope it continues."

And how about Stoudemire? Is he mad enough to raise his game to new level against the Lakers? The Suns hope so.

It could be the deal-breaker in this series. A series that will be defined by skill.

Not luck.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2010/05/18/20100518amare-stoudemire-lamar-odom-lakers-suns.html#ixzz0oO9vZDFo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And once again I showed you it’s been pretty even. We spent 2nd and 3rd rounders this past draft on edge rushers. No one’s going to sit here and do the math on a draft value chart etc. the only reason I even entertained this was because you said we’ve spent nothing on defense when that simply isn’t true. It also didn’t help we traded our ONLY WR worth a damn to trade up for Bryce soo… And this is kind of the issue with the anti Bryce crowd. This crowd tends to blame him for the trade up. I was team Stroud. Had the panthers not taken Young the only other QB they were going to take was Richardson. So your issue should be with Tepper, Morgan, Fitterer not Bryce.  Bryce is who he is and it was pretty obvious who he was during the draft process. Bryce is slowly developing into that guy most thought he’d be. Give him a WR like Jamo and this offense as a whole would improve greatly.  Anyone thinking he was the next Pat Mahomes or Josh Allen is clearly slow. Bryce was always going to need pieces around him much like EVERY other QB Burrow has Chase and Higgins and they’ve done nothing. After losing in AFC Championship in 2022, Burrow is 17-15. QB’s need a team around them It’s why a Jalen Hurts led Eagles team dismantled a Pat Mahomes led KC team in the SB Imo the QB’s doing the most with the least up until this year have been Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson  This year it’s Drake Maye and Josh Allen  Outside of the 3-5 elite type QB’s I’m not really sure what people expect here. Is Bryce ever going to be in that elite category? Nope. Should we punt on Bryce and keep swinging? I don’t think so. Should we keep swinging while hanging onto Bryce? Yeah but I don’t know what that looks like This team as a whole isn’t very good. Offense and defense and that’s the simple truth  
    • I didn't move the goal posts. But anyone who follows football who wants to engage in a rational discussion can't argue that 10 7th round picks are equal to 10 1st rounders in value. The argument has always been we haven't spent as much on defense has we have on offense. Draft picks have value just like salary. We have not spent the same amount of draft pick salary cap on defense that we have on offense since drafting Bryce. It's not even close. Just the 2 1sts we used on Bryce, 2 overall 1sts have a value of 6000. That doesn’t even factor in DJ Moore or the 2 2nds. Bryce cost more than everything we've spent on defense in 6 damn years. 
    • We need to hope this scenario plays our next week he fails with pressure…what that means with Evero, is beyond me
×
×
  • Create New...