Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry Richardson q&a


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

And nobody forced you to become a PSL/season ticket holder. You chose to do that, knowing the rules. As far as I know, there were no guarantees regarding team performance given to us when we signed up.

If I knew at the time that I bought them that our owner was an incompetent, money grubbing leech I would have never made the purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Do not work for the Panthers, have never worked for the Panthers or Mr. Richardson.

So then you admit you are giving your own fan opinion that JR is the only caring owner in NFL? Have you ever met the other owners in the NFL? I doubt it, so quit making such fandome statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you based it on just this year that would make sense, but I was stating that he was doing it on future speculation of contracts, ie next year when he has to make lots of decisions on big deals.

That assumes he signs all of the guys whose contracts are expiring to new big contracts. I don't have a crystal ball but believe we won't be signing everyone. I also believe that he has tried the big agent free signing more than once and it didn't work. He also paid big bucks to our core players and that hasn;t worked that well either. I don't know anything for sure but am speculating that part of the reason for going cheap is that if he can put a decent product on the field for much less than he has spent in prior years for a product that didn't play that much better, then why not go cheap? I think the results of this season may dictate which way he goes next year.

It's not like he sets himself up to rake in 100 of millions each year. In 2007 for instance he barely cleared 2.5million in profit.

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/30/biz_07nfl_Carolina-Panthers_309456.html

Net income is a terrible indicator of actual profits. There are many big coprporations that make millions of dollars every year but show a loss. There are a ton of ways to legally manipulate the books to avoid paying taxes and showing a profit. From the time he bought the franchise in 1993 for 203 million to now the team value has increased to 956 million. A team that makes a profit of 2 million a year doesn't increase its value by three quarters of a billion dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Net income is a terrible indicator of actual profits. There are many big coprporations that make millions of dollars every year but show a loss. There are a ton of ways to legally manipulate the books to avoid paying taxes and showing a profit. From the time he bought the franchise in 1993 for 203 million to now the team value has increased to 956 million. A team that makes a profit of 2 million a year doesn't increase its value by three quarters of a billion dollars.

As much as net income is a terrible indicator of actual profits team value is even worse. Come on are you freaking kidding me? Company value is basically just a representation of overhead. If i have a construction company with no equipment it's worth nothing, if i buy a bulldozer all of a sudden my corporate value has increased. Over time the overall value will increase with an increase of overhead from endorsements, merchandising etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as net income is a terrible indicator of actual profits team value is even worse. Come on are you freaking kidding me? Company value is basically just a representation of overhead. If i have a construction company with no equipment it's worth nothing, if i buy a bulldozer all of a sudden my corporate value has increased. Over time the overall value will increase with an increase of overhead from endorsements, merchandising etc.

Your example is totally incorrect. If you buy a bulldozer your worth hasn't increased, your assets increase but so do your liabilities in the form of a loan unless you paid for it cash. In that case your worth hasn't increased you have simply replaced a cash asset with a material asset unless you bought it for much less than it is worth. If you buy it for market value, your net worth stays the same. Your worth only increases in the event of a loan if you pay if off while it still has some value so your assets remain the same while your liabilities decrease. Or you buy an asset that actually increases in value. Won't happen with a bulldozer but that is what happened with the Panthers organization. Team worth isn't a representation of actual profits but it a representation of your bottom line worth if you sold the business. The relationship with profits is less straight line but if you take your cash and buy assets which appreciate, then you will increase your net worth without showing a big profit. Paying off debts will decrease your liabilities but not necessarily reduce your profits in a straight line fashion depending on whether you can write off the whole expense or have to depreciate it over time.

But enough of that. The bottom line s that Richardson has spent a signiificant portion of his cash building the brand and investing in improvements like upgrading the stadium and facilities which is one of the 4 factors that Forbes used to determine the team net worth. It reduced his net profit and increased his assets and future revenue which increased his team value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then you admit you are giving your own fan opinion that JR is the only caring owner in NFL? Have you ever met the other owners in the NFL? I doubt it, so quit making such fandome statements.

I never said he was the "only" caring owner. I know Mr. Richardson, and have a tremendous amount of respect for him.

I can't make "fandome statements" (whatever they are), but you can blast him all you want? Doesn't seem very right to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not letting thousands of dollars of my hard earn money that I invested go to waste. Like I said, if someone wants to buy my PSLs Im all ears.

Have you listed your PSLs on a site like PantherPSLs.com or even posted in the Huddle PSL Exchange to see if you can find willing buyers? Have you even tried selling the season tickets each year? Or are you just bitching for the sake of bitching and don't really own seats? I know which one I suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you listed your PSLs on a site like PantherPSLs.com or even posted in the Huddle PSL Exchange to see if you can find willing buyers? Have you even tried selling the season tickets each year? Or are you just bitching for the sake of bitching and don't really own seats? I know which one I suspect.

Nope! People that look for PSLs on that site are looking for a bargain. I refuse to take a loss on mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your example is totally incorrect. If you buy a bulldozer your worth hasn't increased, your assets increase but so do your liabilities in the form of a loan unless you paid for it cash. In that case your worth hasn't increased you have simply replaced a cash asset with a material asset unless you bought it for much less than it is worth. If you buy it for market value, your net worth stays the same. Your worth only increases in the event of a loan if you pay if off while it still has some value so your assets remain the same while your liabilities decrease. Or you buy an asset that actually increases in value. Won't happen with a bulldozer but that is what happened with the Panthers organization. Team worth isn't a representation of actual profits but it a representation of your bottom line worth if you sold the business. The relationship with profits is less straight line but if you take your cash and buy assets which appreciate, then you will increase your net worth without showing a big profit. Paying off debts will decrease your liabilities but not necessarily reduce your profits in a straight line fashion depending on whether you can write off the whole expense or have to depreciate it over time.

But enough of that. The bottom line s that Richardson has spent a signiificant portion of his cash building the brand and investing in improvements like upgrading the stadium and facilities which is one of the 4 factors that Forbes used to determine the team net worth. It reduced his net profit and increased his assets and future revenue which increased his team value.

My example was horrible I agree. I was a little toasted, fresh from q wedding rehearsal. Just felt like arguing with no real point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...