Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Cameron: No Good Hypocrite


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://deceiver.com/2010/08/27/james-cameron-on-hollywoods-extravagance-dvds-are-wasteful/

DVDs are wasteful. … It’s a consumer product like any consumer product. I think ultimately we’re going to bypass a physical medium and go directly to a download model and then it’s just bits moving in the system. And then the only impact to the environment is the power it takes to run the computers, run the devices. I think that we’re not there yet, but we’re moving that direction. Twentieth Century Fox has made a commitment to be carbon neutral by the end of 2010. Because of some of these practices that can’t be changed, the only way to do that is to buy carbon offsets. You know, which again, these are interim solutions. But at least it shows that there’s a consciousness that we have to be dealing with carbon pollution and sustainability. …

These are things the studios need to be thinking about. When I do my next film, we’re going to go much farther than we did in terms of running a green set. You know, look at a typical film set. There’s thousands of plastic water bottles that are used in a given week and that all needs to be revisited. Honestly, the truth is, we have to revisit almost every part of our lives and our existence over the next few years. Energy consumption, I think, being the biggest one. Energy and global warming are interlinked issues obviously, and global warming is going to take us out long before plastic pollution. Don’t get me started on that. I just got back from a two-day renewable energy conference in Aspen and it’s grim trying to get the needle of policy to move. You’re there in D.C. You see what goes on there. You see the paralysis of our leaders, even when there’s a Democratic majority. It’s still paralyzed.

But he’s the guy behind the three separate Avatar DVD releases in the first freakin’ place. There was one released on Earth Day, there’s another coming out for Christmas (in his words, “the all-singing, all-dancing, all-bells-and-whistles DVD”), and the 3D version set for release next year to give people enough time to get rid of their rinky-dink hamster-powered televisions and upgrade to an energy-sucking 3D-enabled plasma screen and the accompanying 3D Blu-Ray DVD player.

Plus those 3D glasses produced en masse for theater-goers? Yup, plastic.

And don’t forget the Avatar-themed toys and lunchboxes and Halloween costumes and sheet sets available at Wal-Mart.

But he’s not the one buying all that crap. You are, so you’re the wasteful one, see. He’s just giving you what you want, and preaching about plastic bottles and energy consumption in the meantime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't write it, but as usual, attack the messenger. :D

What I don't understand is, and maybe I'm wrong. But even if you download the movie. You are gonna want to have a hardcopy, right? So you don't have to buy it every time you want to see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hollywood types are always spouting off in favor of the environment.

I remember several years ago when Barbara Streisand came out and said we all need to get rid of our clothes dryers. We should hang our clothes outside and let solar energy dry them.

(I actually prefer to hang clothes outdoors to dry. They smell much better longer than some artificial dryer sheet can provide. I never had a dryer when I had my house in East Charlotte.)

I seriously doubt that she does laundry! Also, I doubt that her Hollywood neighborhood allows you to hang clothes outside!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabblerabble rabble rabble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...