Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I may as well be the 1st 2 say: Moore is NOT the answer

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

gmonet Newbie

gmonet

Posted
Posted

Do you really think that Fox would risk the whole season for one game by putting Moore in if he was actually hurt? Our history is being overcautious way before the current guidelines were put in place.

Especially given that most reports say that Fox is gone no matter what and I am sure Fox knows it better than we do. He isn't going to risk a player needlessly.

Yeh, but then I also believe that Fox tends to think his yute QB's are so much fodder when he's planning on getting his mitts on JD after he lands that mega deal...foolish, but this IS the Panthers! I do believe that Fox is not as high on the MM aromatics as he was on the JD's!

Still, I think that is what we all are saying/hoping/dreading...that they have the sense to keep Matt out, despite Matt's likely fears of being benched permanent like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

this is why i dont think he had a concussion.even if it wasnt that severe it happened pretty late in the game.

Concussions come in all grades of severity from very mild to severe. Since he didn't lose consciousness, didn't suffer any memory loss and remained with a clear sensorium throughout, he obviously suffered a very mild one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Yeh, but then I also believe that Fox tends to think his yute QB's are so much fodder when he's planning on getting his mitts on JD after he lands that mega deal...foolish, but this IS the Panthers! I do believe that Fox is not as high on the MM aromatics as he was on the JD's!

Still, I think that is what we all are saying/hoping/dreading...that they have the sense to keep Matt out, despite Matt's likely fears of being benched permanent like!

Totally off base and unfounded. Fox is a player's coach and has always been cautious about injuries. As for Moore he will be the starter even if he misses the game and Clausen was great. He has shown over the years that that is what he will do no matter what. And Fox has shown he is consistent if nothing else. Moore knows that as does ever player on the team. If you don't do that players would be worried about getting hurt and losing their starting roles and would play tenatively which actually increases the possibility you will get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...