Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Power Rankings

charlotte49er

By charlotte49er,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

Panthers have only 1 way to go!

26 49ers

0-3-0-17/26Yikes. And I picked them to win the NFC West. But the good thing is San Francisco does play in the worst division in the NFL, so they're still in the hunt. However, they'll travel to Kansas City this week where they will face a suddenly improved Chief squad.

27Lions

0-3-0224/27Give Shaun Hill credit for his guts and toughness against Philadelphia, but he's no Matthew Stafford. The one bright spot for Detroit so far has been Jahvid Best, who might be their best back since Barry Sanders retired after the 1998 season.

28Browns

0-3-0126/28They remind me a lot of St. Louis. Cleveland is very competitive, but clearly not talented enough on either side of the ball. The front office needs to add a lot more high-end talent on both sides of the ball if they went to go to the playoffs.

29Raiders

1-2-0122/30Hey, it's winning ugly, Raiders style! In the course of beating the Rams last week they may have found that third-year pro Darren McFadden is starting to become a consistent factor in their running game. +.gif

30Rams

1-2-0130/32I'll say this for St. Louis, they are very competitive. And QB Sam Bradford has not looked like a rookie; he has been very poised so far. What head coach Steve Spagnuolo has to do is find a way to get more pressure on the opposing quarterbacks.

31Panthers

0-3-0225/31It will be interesting to see how quick of a hook head coach John Fox has for his new starting quarterback. The coaching staff will have to be patient with Jimmy Clausen, who has a strong arm, but he probably should be on the sidelines for at least this season.

32Bills

0-3-0-30/32I'm searching for an adjective for this team that's clean, but I'm having a hard time. Anyone have one that isn't a four letter word? Watching this team each week could be hazardous to your health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      lol wut?  Stats dont matter now?  Got it
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      So.... you're admitting he's never going to be the type of QB who can drag his team to victories on a consistent basis? Because in today's NFL, the teams that are constant contenders have QB's who can put up those kind of games will their team to wins when needed. If Bryce was anything near as amazing last year as the Bryce defenders try to insinuate he was, we'd either have won more games or his stats would have been better, if not both. Yes, he showed significant improvement over the last 2 months of the season.  Yes, he had a few clutch  moments/throws/drives in that span too. BUT... It's also very much a true statement that on the whole, he was still AT BEST an average QB during that time period.   And for a QB who was touted as being a PG who can get wins without elite talent around him because of how he sees the game, that's just not good enough, sorry. And none of that is to say he can't do that this year, especially after we gave him a weapon like T-Mac and hopefully an improved XL and Coker.  But stop trying to say he was this amazing QB to end the year who has proven he can (and should) be considered a long term solution as a franchise QB, as it's just not true.
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      In what way is that remotely the same thing as I'm saying here? First things first, comparing QB's to any other position is just asinine to begin with.   Second, you're trying to imply the exact opposite of what I'm saying here, so it just doesn't make sense. I'm saying if you remove the players that teams haven't committed to as their long term QB solutions yet, Bryce is the last player ranked in this set of rankings, that's all.  But sure, go ahead and try to make some weird convoluted equivalent for my love of T-Mac (who btw, you'd probably only need to take away 12-15 WRs for me to rank T-Mac #1 in a dynasty format, just sayin, lol)
×
×
  • Create New...