Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do all women do this?!?


TarPanther9180

Recommended Posts

time is really the biggest issue. not communication. at the end of all the daily tasks, there is little time.

This is the argument that my wife and I have had for years. She has time for all that other stuff, but not for me??? I make time for the things that are important... so that shows me where I am on the list of "important..."

Now you got me ranting... :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the argument that my wife and I have had for years. She has time for all that other stuff, but not for me??? I make time for the things that are important... so that shows me where I am on the list of "important..."

Now you got me ranting... :cool:

then tell her that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

then tell her that

Dude, you don't even know how many times this has been discussed... seriously.

maybe we should have a beer some day. say hooters? crazyhorse? :D

mine actually is legit. she doesn't get off work a lot of times until 7 30.

:lol:

Sounds good to me... yeah, work is an issue, I get that. 7:30 is pretty late... and if you have to go in early, that makes it tough. There are obviously exceptions, but she doesn't have to work ALL the time, nor do you. It's a two way street... if you're doing your part, helping around the house, etc., then she needs to do hers. IOW it needs to be mutual...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

been discussed at length at my house too. she always ends up saying that I am not making enough effort. definitely need to talk to her more about it. i just hate rehashing what i've already told her.

This is the last I'll say about it unless you want to take it to PM... and the only reason I'm posting this is that hopefully someone else can benefit from my experience...

To me it's a "want to" thing. Either you want to "fill in the blank" (help around the house, help with the kids, have sex, etc.), or you don't.

Having a ***-for-tat (no pun intended) quota system is a straight line to trouble in any relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...