Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I H8 WoW


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

Yeah, they do actually.

But I shed my addiction after marriage counseling in 2004. My wife had a point that 40+ hours of WoW a week was a bit much. Still, I got to see the original Onyxia drop in a 40-man :)

From then to 2007, I would play on average 20 hours a week.

I really don't know how this is going to work with a 3 year old and a 10 month old though... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they do actually.

But I shed my addiction after marriage counseling in 2004. My wife had a point that 40 hours of WoW a week was a bit much.

From then to 2007, I would play on average 20 hours a week.

I really don't know how this is going to work with a 3 year old and a 10 month old though... lol

u might as well just burn the game bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u might as well just burn the game bro.

Well, the idea is that me and some friends, who are all married and/or have kids are going to have a set night to play once a week, plus whatever we can manage during the weekends.

But my 'lock is damn tempting to get to 80 before the x-pac comes out. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I go through cycles with wow. I played a lot at release and quit a while before the first expansion. Then I played a good bit through burning crusade and quit a while before lich king came out. Then a played a good bit right when ulduar was released, and then quit. I came back briefly to see icecrown citadel but didn't stick with it. If I wasn't in a raiding guild that didn't mind me quiting for long chunks of time I probably would have never started up again all those times.

I was going to check out everything with the new patch but it seems like fallout will keep me occupied until the expansion comes out. I'm sure I won't be able to resist my curiosity and buy the expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's been mentioned in this thread, yet many are glossing over it... This WR group has a ton of potential. TMAC, XL and Coker, and maybe even Horn as the speed guy will get a ton of snaps in this offense. The reality is that they are all really unproven. Hopefully they're ascending, but we don't know if XL and Coker are maxed out based on last season. TMAC and Horn are ROOKIES. So the only "proven vets" are Thielen, Moore and Renfrow. Not exactly top of the league. Biggest issue being a lack of speed to take the top off of defenses. Say what you want about Tedd Ginn but he was probably the most important receiver on the team in 2015.
    • That would basically make him a top 10 quarterback based on last year's stats if you break down each QB metric, complied and ranked them. I get the premise of the question--why should we get rid of Bryce after the season if the team still sucks, but it's not Bryce's fault?  Fair enough. If Bryce balls out and for whatever reason we still can't get over the hump, he shouldn't catch all the grief for it.  However, I will caveat that while stats can add layers of paint to a canvass, they do not always paint the whole picture.  So while those hypothetical stats are pretty darn good, if we are inept in the red zone settling for FGs or he's coughing up the ball on sacks or completing layup passes that doesn't get us first downs, then statistically he can have a really good season, but it could leave us on the short end of the scoreboard some games.
    • Not many are talking about this player. He played well as a rookie last year. If he refines his blocking, continues studying film, and keeps working hard, I can see him being the next Greg Olsen. I’m expecting 55 catches, 700 yards, 4 TDs this season.  
×
×
  • Create New...