Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our RB's!!!!!


OneBadassCat

Recommended Posts

I think the relationship is about mutual. Deangelo wouldn't have had all those long runs in 08 if it wasn't for him being a badass. Our line isn't that old at all. Gross is the only one in his 30's if I'm not mistaken. Wharton will last a good while longer. We just need to shore up RG and draft or sign a tackle with some potential so that we can groom him in the event one of the tackle's goes down.

Schwartz can be a good RG and a suitable tackle. What we really need is for Duke Robinson to emerge and maul people with Otah. That will solve a lot of depth problems.

Deangelo had some badass blocking in 2008 - linemen were already putting linebackers on their butts by the time DWill hit the line of scrimmage. Moose and Smitty weren't exactly slouches in the blocking department.

Moose is gone and people want to trade Smitty for whatever reason - its gonna let safeties do what they couldn't do before. Jeff King is a good blocker, but I think he really missed having Moose close off the outside.

I'm not sure if I ever liked Gross at LT. He was so good on the right side. When it was clear Otah wasn't coming back, we should have looked for a LT in free agency and moved Gross back. That would have taken a lot of pressure off Schwartz and allowed Kalil to do what he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deangelo had some badass blocking in 2008 - linemen were already putting linebackers on their butts by the time DWill hit the line of scrimmage. Moose and Smitty weren't exactly slouches in the blocking department.

Moose is gone and people want to trade Smitty for whatever reason - its gonna let safeties do what they couldn't do before. Jeff King is a good blocker, but I think he really missed having Moose close off the outside.

I'm not sure if I ever liked Gross at LT. He was so good on the right side. When it was clear Otah wasn't coming back, we should have looked for a LT in free agency and moved Gross back. That would have taken a lot of pressure off Schwartz and allowed Kalil to do what he does.

I agree that Gross should have been moved to RT. I'm just wondering what Otah's future will eventually be. When he was drafted I'm pretty sure it was with the potential to take over LT after a few seasons. However with his health I'm not sure what the game plan is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...