Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Goddell lie to the owners?


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

I see what hes talking about

Goodell said something about the revenue problem a year ago which made owners like JR say oh sh*t and they start panicking and tank the season so they can lock the players out

the article has some calculations that shows that the NFL is wrong about their revenue

Yep. According to the article it was Goddell's BS that got the train rolling in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they are adding the 1 billion, that was agreed to come off the top. Rather is is counted it or not, is the issue. Since the union agreed (if you agree with something, you shouldn't take it back later, right?) to let the owners take off the top, it should not be counted. A good article would have gave the totals BOTH ways....just saying. either way both are wrong..

Both sides are arguing over numbers instead of facts. they should stop arguing about whether it's 70% or 50% and just say the TOTAL they want. so annoying. The owners should just be like, ok it's 50% and we want to give you 40%. or the players should say ok it's 70% and we want to keep it there. It's like they're little kids. The fans don't care what percentage anybody gets. we just want them to figure it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That still does not answer my question. How does he benefit?

He got the owners to opt out of the CBA didn't he. If they can win this and take money from the players and put more into the NFL then he wins. You think his salary is going to stay at 10 mill per when gross revenue should top 20 billion per and its 9 billion per now? What about staying Commissioner and making big bucks? He gets the owners to get more money in their pockets you think he is going anywhere soon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...