Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team rebuild formula ver. Who got it right?


CAVSS

Recommended Posts

You are in it to win it. We've had this discussion before on here. Its about making it to the big game. Not winning in the first round.

Thats's call back tracking what you just said.... one minute you need these wins to win in the playofs... now were talking about making the superbowl when your previous statement was proven incorrect.

So Tampa is a failure because they weren't in the 6.25 percent of teams who make the super bowl each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are in it to win it. We've had this discussion before on here. Its about making it to the big game. Not winning in the first round.

and now, since ive answered the OP, im leaving it. No need to keep saying the same thing over and over again.

I bet if I go back and find a superbowl team that made it the game after a easy road to the playoffs but lose, then you will say it's all about winning the superbowl only. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are in it to win it. We've had this discussion before on here. Its about making it to the big game. Not winning in the first round.

and now, since ive answered the OP, im leaving it. No need to keep saying the same thing over and over again.

I bet if I go back and find a superbowl team that made it the game after a easy road to the playoffs but lose, then you will say it's all about winning the superbowl only. :rolleyes:

Go dig up one of these old threads w/ playoff discussions in it. Ive had this one before.

Like I said…. Wrong again!!!!!!

2007 Superbowl champs New York Giants only one 10 games that year… lost to 5 teams with winning records while on beating 1!!! Yes only 1! But they were superbowl champs… And they beat up on some pooty teams that year…. Hmm sounds just like tampa bay…. And I was just told a team like that can not win in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you are simply being contrary. If you have an example of a better team rebuilding quickly in the modern football era please provide some insight?

Dolphins - 2008

1-15 to 11-5 and in the playoffs by taking a linemen in the draft and getting a vet/second round QB

Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll be funny if Tampa is 6-10 next year and we bump this thread.

I'm not saying they are bad, just that they aren't as good as everyone is making them out to be. Freeman had a decent year but he also had a good run game. Let's make them do it for more than one year before we crown them, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll be funny if Tampa is 6-10 next year and we bump this thread.

I'm not saying they are bad, just that they aren't as good as everyone is making them out to be. Freeman had a decent year but he also had a good run game. Let's make them do it for more than one year before we crown them, no?

I dont think anyone is trying to say we want Carolina to become Tampa, or mimic them completely in every way. Simply saying that their basic formula for rebuilding was a good one. In fact it is pretty close to the formula of the Falcons I'm just not getting my hopes up that high due to the QB options at our disposal. If Luck hadn't turned out to be my greatest mortal enemy then I would have said Falcons.

I very sincerely hope that they go 6-10 next year because that most likely means that we didn't finish last in our division again.

But, if at that time you would like to say I told you so, I will respond with yes you did make a completely contrarian statement that fortunately for us came true. However it in no way disproved my theory or offered a insightful alternative. (Edit) didn't see your Dolphins post; good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We don't have to tear down Dak to appreciate what Bryce did yesterday. Dak had 0 running game. If the cowboys were better, he'd be a legit MVP candidate if he keeps playing this way.  They did it with Ceedee last year, but they do a better job of anybody we play consistently of getting their best receiver off Jaycee.  Bryce was good too. If we just catch the ball that was intercepted, we probably win by 7+, and Bryce goes over 200 yards passing.  Biggest shift the last few weeks has been play calling. I thought Canales abandoned the run game way to early at times last year. This year he really seems to be sticking with it.  I still think Chuba is better at making 4 yards when there's nothing there, but Rico is better at making 30 yards when there's 6 there. I like the direction. Hopefully we can get Moton, Sanders and Coker back and really be dangerous. Our play action game is pretty deadly right now.  Unrelated: My favorite quality about Bryce right now is his ability to see the defensive hold and throw the ball there. He EXPOSES the officials when they don't call it. That one on Tetaroia yesterday late in the game was a bad miss on their part. 
    • That sacks allowed number lookin juicy!  
    • This is a game the Panthers should win... just the sort of game they lose. The Panthers have a bad habit that goes back years of playing down to the competition's level only to mess around and lose the game. The Jets game should be taken very seriously! But I want to enjoy the fact that they beat the Cowboys for at least another day or so!
×
×
  • Create New...