Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Questions About the pr0n Business Answered Here


YourManInAmsterdam

Recommended Posts

... or Dink Flamingo who used to be (and maybe still is) based around Fayetteville and was best know for using guys from Ft. Bragg in his solo scenes. It caused a HUGE ruckus out there when it came to light. Heads rolled.

This is a rather different situation of course.

But I have to admit, even with the aid of straight porn playing off camera, it doesn't seem like all that much of a turn on (for a straight guy) to sit around and abuse oneself while some dude walks around filming you, occasionally taking special care to get a close-up without using the zoom function.

That and I remember Dink Flamingo often times talked to the guys (from behind the camera) during the scenes too. Seems like that would make things even more difficult.

Maybe they have a girl filming and an all girl cast. The Dink Flamingo thing is LOL no way could I get a boner talking to some dude filming me. Would make an excellent exploitation film. Someone persuade the Japanese to do it and you've got a nice mind fug.

But I agree there are a lot of closeted bisexuals out there. Otherwise, why would anyone ever think that sexuality is a choice?

I certainly never chose to be turned on exclusively by women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need a part time job and was thinking about applying to be a camera man for a porn company but I just need one question answered.

Is it generally frowned upon for a cameraman to jerk off while filming a scene?? The way I see it, if I have a steady cam or a tripod (hehe also my nickname) I don't see what the problem is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they have a girl filming and an all girl cast. The Dink Flamingo thing is LOL no way could I get a boner talking to some dude filming me. Would make an excellent exploitation film. Someone persuade the Japanese to do it and you've got a nice mind fug.

But I agree there are a lot of closeted bisexuals out there. Otherwise, why would anyone ever think that sexuality is a choice?

I certainly never chose to be turned on exclusively by women.

There are a lot of variables that can make pretty substantial differences. All I'm saying is that I agree with you in the sense that just because a guy us in a movie that's marketed to gay men, it doesn't make that him gay or bisexual necessarily. Marketing is just marketing.

But if a guy is running around screwing dudes, don't try to sell me on the gay-for-pay thing. Even Viagra and the like won't help you if your proverbial buttons aren't being pushed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...