Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Franchise Tag


rko396

Recommended Posts

What is the trade value of the franchise tag? as often as it's stated that 2 first round draft picks are needed for a trade to happen, it has never worked out that way. New England franchised Cassel and then traded him AND another player for not even ONE first round pick. it wasn't like KC gave them a first and second and Bob Kraft said "Ok, close enough", New England gave them an extra man and still didnt recieve even half of the "value" of the tag. So why does anything think Pep is going to be any different? the vlue assigned to the tag is a joke since obviously owners can accept any trade they want. If the Giants offer a 7th round pick for Pep and we take it (obviously sarcasm) then thats perfectly within the rule book. so basically, theres no value assigned to the tag at all. its just like any other trade where as long as there is a mutual agreement, the transaction will take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why the Pats "undersold" Cassell? It could be Pioli "hooking himself up" considering he almost executed the whole deal himself. (ex pats gm, now kc gm)

what kind of a discount do you give a guy who got you respected amoung the NFL and 3 SB rings?

However, Carolina will get more for Pep. QB's are a much greater risk anyways.

2 first rounders are the "by the book" asking price, but when a team "ownes the rights" of a player whats to stop them from reaching a deal they are comfortable?

I thinks Pep will come atleast with 1 1st rounder and another late pick, or that and a very high 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

undersold doesn't even begin to describe it. belichick must just be hookin up Pioli like you said, but thats still crazy. Living in New York, I have seen prolly 12-13 of the Patriots games this year and Cassel looks pretty good in a system that even David Carr could thrive in. But still what a deal that was for KC. When I heard about it on the radio as it unfolded, i heard the 2nd round draft pick part and waited to hear the rest. then i realized that was it and my mouth dropped along with (in my mind) Pepper's value. I know QB and DE and prolly the 2 most opposite positions on the field but theres no way a franchised player going for a second round pick is going to help us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 first rounders is the price for a team to take a player without the other teams permission. It all depends on what the team losing the player wants for him. In our case I dont see less than 1 first rounder and another pick for Peppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you do a little more research on the deal, BB may have actually snookered Pioli on this one.

It's starting to sound like Cassel may have caught Belicheat with his pants down, he signed the franchise tag, and may not be willing to re-work for anyone as part of a trade sticking the Patriots with a 14.65 million dollar bench warmer.

When you think about it 14.65 million guaranteed is a nice paycheck for a seventh rounder who may not be good enough to cut it. He's cashing in right now.... his reluctance to negotiate made him mostly untradable.

By trading Vrabel and Cassel as a package BB was able to clear 17 million off the books and pick up a second rounder in the process..... Brilliant!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no, i completly understand why the PAt's did it. that was questioned at all. i was just curious as to why they jumped at the first offer even tho it was only one second round pick. they could have gotten much more. so many teams are a QB away from being a contender, I just thought that if when the tag was giving a few weeks ago, if u said Cassel AND another player for one second round pick, you woulda felt like that was a steal for the cheifs. hell, for just a second round pick, we shoulda thought about jumping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no, i completly understand why the PAt's did it. that was questioned at all. i was just curious as to why they jumped at the first offer even tho it was only one second round pick. they could have gotten much more. so many teams are a QB away from being a contender, I just thought that if when the tag was giving a few weeks ago, if u said Cassel AND another player for one second round pick, you woulda felt like that was a steal for the cheifs. hell, for just a second round pick, we shoulda thought about jumping

No team in their right mind would want him without signing him to a long term deal. His only obligation to the team that acquired him (the Chiefs) is one year at 14.65 million. For that matter no team would sign him for 10 million per year (other reports say that's what he's asking).

His salary demands may have made him untradable so no reason to hold out for a better offer that isn't coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that is the offical value of the tag? (Using the Panthers ofr example) if a team offers 2 first rounders then then we must give Pep to that team? i was wondering where that 2 first rounders rule came from cuz thats what everyone talked about and yet I cant remember it ever happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that is the offical value of the tag? (Using the Panthers ofr example) if a team offers 2 first rounders then then we must give Pep to that team? i was wondering where that 2 first rounders rule came from cuz thats what everyone talked about and yet I cant remember it ever happening

Under the rules of the CBA a team must receive two first rounders as compensation for a fanchised player, unless the team holding the players rights chooses to trade the player, which they are free to do for anything they want including players, picks, or even cash.

Edit: And yes if a team gives the team holding the players tag two first rounders they are free to offer the player , but the team who holds the tag can match whatever the other team offers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that is the offical value of the tag? (Using the Panthers ofr example) if a team offers 2 first rounders then then we must give Pep to that team? i was wondering where that 2 first rounders rule came from cuz thats what everyone talked about and yet I cant remember it ever happening

Pretty much it. We have right to match it but if we dont then the other team has to give up two first rounders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea ive read that last part in many posts but basically what that is saying is "If not 2 first rounders, then you can trade him for anything" so that means its JUST like being traded any other time. there seems to be absolutly NO difference between trading a tagged player and anyone else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Squirrel, that was the part i never understood. All i ever heard was "Oh Pep is franchised that means automatic two first rounders" yet like i said, that never happens so i was confussed. but thanks again for clearin that up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you do a little more research on the deal, BB may have actually snookered Pioli on this one.

It's starting to sound like Cassel may have caught Belicheat with his pants down, he signed the franchise tag, and may not be willing to re-work for anyone as part of a trade sticking the Patriots with a 14.65 million dollar bench warmer.

When you think about it 14.65 million guaranteed is a nice paycheck for a seventh rounder who may not be good enough to cut it. He's cashing in right now.... his reluctance to negotiate made him mostly untradable.

By trading Vrabel and Cassel as a package BB was able to clear 17 million off the books and pick up a second rounder in the process..... Brilliant!

I've seen that take too.

I do think it's possible that the old "future considerations" thing may have played in here (though unspoken).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...