Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does Pat Y say we only have 40mil to spend?

koolkatluke

By koolkatluke,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Dwill wasn't that injured and could have came back and played a few games after getting injured from what I've heard. He will get payed, I think both want Dwill in Charlotte.

Also another thing, I just don't see CJ turning down the massive contract he's about to be offered by Carolina. Plus he wants to stay in Charlotte.

Very possible, but neither you nor I know for sure if DW was injured (they are paid a lot of money to play the game) nor can we trust statements CJ has made-I have heard both sides, actually. His tweets are one source.

I am not saying DW is done, but if he was not hurt, he should have INSISTED on playing. He was in a contract year. The NFL doesn't even pull starters much because stats are so much of the contract. If Fox thinks he was given DW a break or using him to stick the man, then he did DW no favors. I do not buy the argument that he was not hurt.

How many teams can say they got their money's worth signing RBs to second contracts? Not many. How many teams can you name who do a good job of parting with players before they start a downward spiral. Pittsburgh, New England come to mind. AFC super bowl representatives 7 of the last 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eViL jEsTeR Newbie

eViL jEsTeR

Posted
Posted

Those people that think that all of the sudden we are going to spend big money on free agents are probably going to be really disappointed. Our FO doesn't like to spend big on free agents because they believe that if those players were really that good they wouldn't be free agents.

In other words free agents are almost always overrated and/or overpriced.

would agree 95% of the time however this year there is a guy who most def is not overrated and while likely will command a very high price, i feel a shut down corner is a must especially in our division facing brees/colston, ryan/white and now freeman/williams.

Namdi would be well worth the money he commands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...