Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Skyward Sword


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

Anyone else get this early? I'm 12 hours into the game on the third dungeon and am having a blast. Some of the enemies are strange and I end up swinging the wii remote like a mad man but others are interesting and are fun to learn how to defeat.

For those without a wii, if you have a gaming PC that's up to date, there is a wii emulator that reportedly can run the game well:

http://kotaku.com/5860550/skyward-sword-running-on-pc-looks-gorgeous

If I had a complaint I wish there was more story to the game but alas it's a game and not a book so what can one expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That excuse is old hat. Plenty of games have great stories, and it's not just new games.

Nintendo really doesn't buy into the idea of challenging their fans with different content, though. Hence Nintendo fans buying the same games from them every two years for the last few decades.

I would tend to agree with this. The LoZ series really has gone downhill ever since OoT. With that said, I'm excited to fire up my wife's Wii in the not to distant future and see if Skyward Sword is any better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That excuse is old hat. Plenty of games have great stories, and it's not just new games.

Nintendo really doesn't buy into the idea of challenging their fans with different content, though. Hence Nintendo fans buying the same games from them every two years for the last few decades.

Yahtzee, is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That excuse is old hat. Plenty of games have great stories, and it's not just new games.

Nintendo really doesn't buy into the idea of challenging their fans with different content, though. Hence Nintendo fans buying the same games from them every two years for the last few decades.

You could say that about so many games though including all sports and FPS games. Also, having just finished Uncharted 3, I can say it's the same as 1 and 2.

SS is similar to previous Zeldas but it has a wonderful new soundtrack, different graphic style, new characters, a new adventure with new puzzles and new ideas especially with how it interfaces the wii motion plus controls.

More than I could say of a lot of sequels out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I would tend to agree with this. The LoZ series really has gone downhill ever since OoT. With that said' date=' I'm excited to fire up my wife's Wii in the not to distant future and see if Skyward Sword is any better....[/quote']

windwaker and twilight princess were flat-out AMAZING games. majora's mask lacked a little but it was still a damn good game. only bad game in the series: zelda 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...