Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol @ luck!!

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

I think most people understand Luck hasnt proven hes as good as has been hyped the past year. I think he'll be a good player, not a bust, but he wont dominate on the next level and thats mainly how hes been sold. Not winning a title or Heisman is a dissapointment since thats a big reason he came back to school. I think he should stay one more year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaSock Collaborator

CarolinaSock

Posted
Posted

Somebody please explain to me how this fuger is the most "NFL ready QB" when He can't even beat out his peers for a Heisman @ the Collegiate level!!!

I smell Ryan Leaf from a mile away!

I was way too drunk to post this last night, but it needed to be said.

Chris Weinke, Troy Smith, Matt Leinart, Jason White, Eric Crouch say hi. That's just the 2000s. Weird, I don't see Joe Montana, Dan Marino, John Elway, or Peyton Manning on that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DirtyMagic97 Newbie

DirtyMagic97

Posted
Posted

I hope he is a bigger bust that Leaf. I hate saying that but prove something first. Luck is in Canton already and hasn't thrown an NFL pass yet.

Glad to see you wish a 22 year old kid failure. It isn't his fault that he has been hyped the way he has. He has no control over what the fools at ESPN say about him. He turned down the NFL to return to his teammates to try to win a National Championship. I think he's a good kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Heisman does not equal best pro prospect.

This

I think most people understand Luck hasnt proven hes as good as has been hyped the past year. I think he'll be a good player, not a bust, but he wont dominate on the next level and thats mainly how hes been sold. Not winning a title or Heisman is a dissapointment since thats a big reason he came back to school. I think he should stay one more year.

Question: Why do you always make things up, or make non-facts facts to try and twist things and prove a point? It can be your opinion that he is over hyped, and underachiever, or a disappointment in your eyes... But it was never stated his reason for returning were winning a heisman and a title... He specifically said he came back to finish his degree and play with his finish and finish with the same group of guys he came in with 4 years prior.

You have valid good opinions, no need to make up/speculate garbage to boost your points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Glad to see you wish a 22 year old kid failure. It isn't his fault that he has been hyped the way he has. He has no control over what the fools at ESPN say about him. He turned down the NFL to return to his teammates to try to win a National Championship. I think he's a good kid.

The same people who said Cam will never be able to play at an NFL level. Prove it until then the hype means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Chris Weinke, Troy Smith, Matt Leinart, Jason White, Eric Crouch say hi. That's just the 2000s. Weird, I don't see Joe Montana, Dan Marino, John Elway, or Peyton Manning on that list.

Cam Newton just stopped by the house and said "Fug those people on your little list, none of them can see me!" basically Cam said "hi" right back @ you.

I find it hilarious that people here think that Luck will be a good NFL QB... LOL

Proof that ESPN isn't just a sports monopoly, but also now in the business of brainwashing people.

Funny how like 95% of the people here didn't even want Cam, because of the way the media outlets portrayed him... And now look...

Get on my level or stfu! A bunch of "know it alls" that are always wrong.

Just as I said Cam will save this franchise well b4 the draft, and before we even had the #1 pick locked in... I'm also calling that Luck will Suck.

Save the date, quote the post... I really don't care!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaSock Collaborator

CarolinaSock

Posted
Posted

Cam Newton just stopped by the house and said "Fug those people on your little list, none of them can see me!" basically Cam said "hi" right back @ you.

I find it hilarious that people here think that Luck will be a good NFL QB... LOL

Proof that ESPN isn't just a sports monopoly, but also now in the business of brainwashing people.

Funny how like 95% of the people here didn't even want Cam, because of the way the media outlets portrayed him... And now look...

Get on my level or stfu! A bunch of "know it alls" that are always wrong.

Just as I said Cam will save this franchise well b4 the draft, and before we even had the #1 pick locked in... I'm also calling that Luck will Suck.

Save the date, quote the post... I really don't care!

Weird, I don't remember even mentioning Luck. You talked about heisman = NFL success, when it's pretty obvious that's far from the truth. I present evidence supporting that, and you ramble about something completely unrelated. You should probably just keep quite if you can't actually provide a coherent rebuttal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...