Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crappiest Bobcats team of all-time?

savage

By savage,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

pantherfan49 Newbie

pantherfan49

Posted
Posted

Would Drummond or Barnes make them a contender?

Bobs are at least 3-4 years away from being a contender. And Barnes won't help much as scoring wings are plentiful in the NBA. Barnes does not look like a super star, instead he looks very much like his ceiling is similar to Corey Maggettes. The team needs an inside presence to open up the spacing for shooters.

At this point, the only starting position in which the Bobcats are in the upper half of the league at is the PG position with DJ, while Hendo is going to be flirting with top 15 in the near future.

CM is serviceable at the SF spot (when healthy), DJ White is a very solid role player that could start on a team that had good players at other positions, and fugging LOL at the 5 spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdandi1 Newbie

cdandi1

Posted
Posted

I love MJ as a player, but he has to be one of the worst owners in the history of the NBA. Hes run it into the ground.

That is a rather extreme comment. Jordan has done great things for the franchise since taking over as majority owner. The 'Cats have a competent GM finally whose ability as a team builder won't be felt with team until all of this young talent grows. Jordan could have continued with .500 basketball for a few more years before having to go through this rebuilding mode, instead him and Cho have decided to start now.

But Jordan's impact as an owner cannot be seen through the core product but through his ancillary achievements. The 'Cats have increased corporate sponsorship and involvement two-fold since Johnson left (SBJ, 2011). They have also increased season ticket holders, lowered almost all ticket prices and has established a viable entertainment option (separate from play on the court) with renewed relationships within the community and NBA.

Jordan has also shown his commitment to the franchise..I read in that same SBJ article that he has given millions of his own $ into the franchise. His commitment though was shown through his hard stance for small market teams during the labor deal.

There are big problems with the 'Cats, but I feel confident Jordan isn't one of them. JMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to really ? Pauls dumbass rotations and defense. That zone they played tonight was the stupidest poo I've ever seen. Then why in the hell do you have Tyrus on Joe Johnson and Hendo on Vald are you serious? Final the lovefest with Diaw needs to End he is fat and lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...