Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CB Combine Winners?

KBRed

By KBRed,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KBRed Community Regular

KBRed

Posted
Posted

I was bored looking at top ten results for CB's. These were the names I saw the most for 40 times, vertical jump, broad jump, 3 cone drill, 20 yd shuttle, and 60 yd shuttle. These are their rankings at the combine.

Josh Robinson (UCF): 1st 40, 2nd Vert, 1st Broad Jump, 1st 3-Cone, 5th 20 Yd

Height: 5'10

Weight: 199lb.

Projected: 4th

Stephon Gilmore (South Carolina): 3rd 40, 8th Vert, 7th Broad Jump, 4th 3-Cone, 2nd 20 Yd, 4th 60 Yd

Height: 6'0

Weight: 190lb.

Projected: 2nd

Coty Sensabaugh (Clemson): 4th 40, 6th Vert, 9th Broad, 3rd 3-Cone, 10th 20 Yd

Height: 5'11

Weight: 189lb.

Projected: NR

It appears Josh Robinson might boost his stock up a bit. What do you think?

Others:

Janoris Jenkins: 6th 40, 5th 60 Yd

Coryell Judie: 8th 40, 5th Vert, 3rd Broad

Morris Claiborne: 10th 40, 10th 60 Yd

Ron Brooks: 2nd 40, 3rd Vert

Jamell Fleming: 4th Broad Jump, 6th 3-Cone, 4th 20, 1st 60 Yd, 2nd Bench

Justin Bethel: 1st Vert, 2nd Broad Jump, 8th 3-Cone, 5th Bench

Casey Hayward: 7th 3-Cone, 1st 20 Yd, 2nd 60 Yd, 5th Bench

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...