Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Bobcats finalizing deal with Ramon Sessions

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

KaseKlosed Collaborator

KaseKlosed

Posted
Posted

I'm tired of messing with DJ...cut bait and sign Ramon....he's from Myrtle Beach, he'll probably like

playing closer to home.

Yup I used to Hoop against him at the cinema 10 bball court in myrtle beach, he has come a long waaaaaay, im happy for him....never got a chance to dunk on him tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

I think Sessions is going to fit great here in Charlotte. Dunlap said he wanted point guards who can take the ball to the rim like Ramon Sessions has done throughout his career and like Kemba Walker did at UCONN. I expect Walker and Sessions to make a formidable one-two threat at the point guard position.

Yup!

I think Cho's going with the same mindset of building this team the same way he helped built OKC.

-We hired a coach who wants to run an up-tempo system, who also knows defense.

-PG who can light up the scoreboard (Kemba / Sessions : Westbrook)

-Good wing defenders (MKG / Hendo / Tayor : Sefolosha)

-Good wing shooter (Gordon : Harden)

-Defensive big man (Bismack : Ibaka)

[if we could sign a Humphries or Haywood, he'd be our Perkins]

We're just left without a Durant type of player. And that should be fill in next year draft, Yes!! Shabazz Muhammad.

We're going to resemble OKC when it's all said and done. Cho knows we need offense but he also knows we gotta play hard defense like OKC. He's not building us like a team of Golden State, where every night it's a shoot out but playing with no defense. If you really look at it, we're prepared to be better than some of these other teams, ex: Warriors, Kings, Pistons etc. All of them are mediocre teams who will win some games but are not true contenders. They all needs to rebuild but are looking pass that, which will come and haunt them later. Though, we'll be picking top 3 next year, not bc we suck but bc that's Cho's plan of rebuilding. We're tanking it again in 2012 for Shabazz. You gotta knoe MJ wants a star shooter sooner than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...