Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Read Option


ItsPantone278

Recommended Posts

Definitely on a play here or there, but you need LBr's if you plan on shutting it down an entire game.

If you can make the right read, and add the threat of play action. It can be productive. You just can't have negative plays.

I don't know if it will work as a base package, but I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can make the right read, and add the threat of play action. It can be productive. You just can't have negative plays.

I don't know if it will work as a base package, but I dunno.

But we really didn't add play action, at least against Seattle. We were in shotgun formation for 2/3 of our plays (no, that's not a made up number; I charted plays) and very, very rarely showed any kind of run fake.

That is a mistake in my mind, because Cam has a really good play action fake, both coming out under center or faking the read option out of the shotgun. The defense did not have to hesitate that split second to see if it was a run or pass, as we showed pass all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OL wasn't blocking ANY TYPE OF RUN. None at all. Under center, shotgun, nothing worked because the OL was allowing guys through gaps at the snap. That had nothing to do with execution of the play or the read. It had to do with execution of the OL in both pass and run blocking all game long.

I have a hard time focusing on the topic with your "double option" picture of the bikinis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we really didn't add play action, at least against Seattle. We were in shotgun formation for 2/3 of our plays (no, that's not a made up number; I charted plays) and very, very rarely showed any kind of run fake.

That is a mistake in my mind, because Cam has a really good play action fake, both coming out under center or faking the read option out of the shotgun. The defense did not have to hesitate that split second to see if it was a run or pass, as we showed pass all the way.

I dont disagree at all. I believe Chud wants to see some rhythm in the read option before he starts to throw in the wrinkles. Just haven't been good enough as a team to pull it off. I think well continue to see it though, even without Kalil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one way to do it, it does appear that with the bigger draft picks of the last 5 years…..majority haven’t steered clear of young QBs on the roster being their hopeful guy. Especially past their rookie seasons but even some the biggest ones have had it early.   As far as Andy Dalton, the two young guys he has “mentored”…..have had very rough NFL starts.  Which really ask the why the heck is Dalton here.   He doesn’t really check any box.  No young potential.  Can’t step in and win.  And his mentor track record with Fields and now Bryce is bad 
    • I had thought the Panthers might let him play out his contract this year and hope he stays healthy. If not draft a left tackle and move Ekwonu to right tackle. 
    • Frankly, if most teams in the NFL lose their starting QB for a significant amount of time, they're screwed. The fantasy is that one has a future Tony Romo or a Nick Foles that can carry a stacked team. The reality is that you might get roughly 3~5 games out of your backup before it all falls apart. Remember all of Peyton Manning's backups? Utterly terrible. Speaking of backup QB's, Raiders may need one. https://www.nfl.com/news/raiders-qb-aidan-o-connell-suffered-fractured-wrist-in-preseason-finale-expected-to-be-out-6-8-weeks
×
×
  • Create New...