Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera on sound fx


panther4life

Recommended Posts

fug O'Mare. RR has little intensity. Even when he gets fired up, it's only on plays that any other coach would be running up and down the sidelines on.

I don't understand the anti-Rivera rhetoric that suggests Rivera does things differently than 31 other NFL head coaches. Do you really think that for a given situation, there's the way RR does it, and then the way 31 other guys do?

Care to elaborate some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the anti-Rivera rhetoric that suggests Rivera does things differently than 31 other NFL head coaches. Do you really think that for a given situation, there's the way RR does it, and then the way 31 other guys do?

Care to elaborate some?

No, I believe there is the way Rivera does it, and every other NFL coach is unique in the way they do things. They are people too, with personalities and ways they prefer to do things. Don't lump me in with the blind "clean house" crowd. I'm not just blindly hating on him because I'm upset with the play of the team, I'm making an observation that if it were me on those sidelines I'd be intense and I'd be constantly talking with my players and I'd pull my OC's and DC's heads out of their asses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the anti-Rivera rhetoric that suggests Rivera does things differently than 31 other NFL head coaches. Do you really think that for a given situation, there's the way RR does it, and then the way 31 other guys do?

Care to elaborate some?

I understand where you are coming from, but to the general audience, at least sell the fact that you care through your mannerisms. The NFL is a business and entertainment outlet, everyone is watching. If you are 6-10 one season, and 1-4 the next, the "stoic-statue" look will not bolster the confidence in fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...