Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Busy day for Bears


dimbee

Recommended Posts

^^^

Didn't have to give up draft picks for any of them is what I believe fuzz would think.

I don't think that Cutler would have been happy and given his all in Den with McD after everything HE FELT was done TO him. They had to get rid of him.

Chi is banking on QB making more of a difference than receivers do. McD is gambling that a good QB with great skill players and his offensive scheme is sufficient. I think MCD is right. Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, they will have to respect his arm strength. Certainly a guy with a strong arm like his will be an ideal thing to have in the swirling winds of Chi.

I imagine that this is the main reason Chi dumped Orton for him, his arm. I don't think it will make that much difference because I don't think Orton was so horrible other than not having the arm strength of Cutler. But I didn't watch all Orton's games so I could be wrong in that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well hell's bells that's all he will have to do in Mickey D's offense. That's exactly what Cassel did. He'll be just fine because he has pretty close to the same skill position talent in Den as Cassel had in NE (remembering that he and Moss weren't hooking up very well most of the year). Heck if Moreno pans out he will have better. And a great OL also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true at all.

Cutler may be a top 13 or so QB IMO. He has the arm, and the smarts, but not the leadership or the intangibles.

Also do you find it at all strange that he has not had a winning season in 7 + years?

What gamble did the bears take? You mean you don't consider trading away two first round draft picks for a player that forced his way off of his last team, and that player being a QB? Or maybe the risk that they took taking a sub .500 NFL QB for those two draft picks?

thefuzz do you even know what "intangibles" are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true at all.

Cutler may be a top 13 or so QB IMO. He has the arm, and the smarts, but not the leadership or the intangibles.

Also do you find it at all strange that he has not had a winning season in 7 + years?

What gamble did the bears take? You mean you don't consider trading away two first round draft picks for a player that forced his way off of his last team, and that player being a QB? Or maybe the risk that they took taking a sub .500 NFL QB for those two draft picks?

thefuzz why do you think Cutler's production and the perception that the highly productive QB can't lead a team is more reasonable than the fact that the Broncos have been one of the worst teams in scoring defense the last two years when trying to explain why the Broncos can't get to the playoffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't one of the crowd that wanted Cutler here. Calling huim a good QB I get, but one of the best in the NFL? Sorry, that's homerific.

Would I have paid what the Bears did to get Cutler? No. I applaud the move to get him given their QB issues, but I think they gave up too much.

Will he pan out? Don't know. At this point, there's just as much chance he's the next Jeff George as there is that he's the next John Elway.

(honestly, this is mostly rehash of prior statements)

What I'd worry about if I were a Bears fan? If he doesn't play well enough to justify the trade terms, I could see a scenario that finds both Lovie Smith and Jerry Angelo looking for work. As far as Angelo, I'm 50-50 on that, but I think Lovie Smith losing his job would be a shame.

Mr. Scot why do you think Cutler has so much more in common with a QB who never showed the kind of strides in development his first three years as Jay did than just the fact that their relationships with their first teams ended on a sour note?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Scot why do you think Cutler has so much more in common with a QB who never showed the kind of strides in development his first three years as Jay did than just the fact that their relationships with their first teams ended on a sour note?

Same reason as Dungy (i.e. questions about his maturity and attitude)

If he fixes them, he could be fine. If not, issues could be on the horizon.

Not that complicated, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason as Dungy (i.e. questions about his maturity and attitude)

If he fixes them, he could be fine. If not, issues could be on the horizon.

Not that complicated, really.

I've read the Dungy interviews, and I'm fairly certain he hasn't called him the second coming of Jeff George

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read the Dungy interviews, and I'm fairly certain he hasn't called him the second coming of Jeff George

Same idea. Different terms.

Dungy thinks it's possible his immaturity will derail his talent. George is an example of that.

Would you categorically deny that it's a possibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you categorically deny that it's a possibility?

Nothing is impossible in the NFL and everything is possible.

Eli Manning's posturing when the Chargers drafted him and could definitely be categorized as immaturity, and he won a Super Bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is impossible in the NFL and everything is possible.

Eli Manning's posturing when the Chargers drafted him and could definitely be categorized as immaturity, and he won a Super Bowl

Likewise, John Elway's.

You'd have to admit though that there are more examples of guys like Ryan Leaf and Jeff George than there are Manning and Elway.

Could Cutler grow up? Sure, but the burden of proof right now is on him. Until he shows me otherwise - and he could - I have my doubts.

Does that seem unreasonable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...